Business

Thinking About Leaving Your Job?

Published

3 years ago

April 7, 2023

It’s normal to wonder what other career opportunities are out there waiting for you. For some employees, this is a temporary feeling that follows a bad day at work. Others may be seriously considering quitting their job. If you’ve been thinking of leaving your job, whether you’re hoping to have a new one lined up or just planning to take a break for a few months, there are many things to consider. Starts by asking yourself these questions.

What are the pros and cons of my current job?

Reasons to quit can range from wanting a better work-life balance to seeking out more opportunities for professional growth. It’s a good idea to write down your reasons to move on and contrast them with the overall positives of your current job. Writing and reviewing the pros and cons of your job may help you decide if resigning is the right move for you. The cons may not seem like dealbreakers after you’ve given it some thought. Conversely, you may also find that the pros are not good enough to warrant remaining in the role.

Can I afford to take a break from work?

If you plan to quit without having another job lined up, it’s crucial to evaluate your finances beforehand. You may want to ensure you have enough money saved up to cover your living expenses for a period of time. If you have any outstanding debts, you’ll need to make sure you’re able to continue making payments. Consider your emergency fund and any amounts you’ve saved up for leisure expenses. What other sources of funding do you have access to, if needed? For example, can you borrow against the cash value of a permanent life insurance policy, such as whole life insurance?

What are my job prospects?

In the current economy, this is a vital question to ask yourself. It’s important to research the market thoroughly and be realistic about your prospects before leaving your job. If you suspect that your skills may be less in demand right now, it may be better to find another job before resigning. On the other hand, if you’re still fielding calls from recruiters and feel confident that finding your next role won’t take too long then it may be less risky to take some time off.

Whether you’re thinking of pursuing a new role or taking some time off, the decision to resign could be the right move. However, it’s important to think carefully about your expenses, life circumstances, and career goals before making a decision.

The primary purpose of permanent life insurance is to provide a death benefit. Using permanent life insurance accumulated value to supplement retirement income will reduce the death benefit and may affect other aspects of the policy.

Business

Click for Counsel: YesLawyer Wants to Make Lawyers as Accessible as Wi-Fi

Published

14 hours ago

April 1, 2026

Matthew Wiles

Photo Courtesy of: YesLawyer

Byline: Andi Stark

For many people facing a legal problem, the most difficult part is not understanding their rights but finding a lawyer willing to speak with them in the first place. Long wait times, unclear pricing, and administrative hurdles often delay even the most basic consultations. YesLawyer, an AI-enabled plaintiff firm operating across all 50 states, is testing whether technology can shorten that gap.

Founded in 2024 by 25-year-old entrepreneur Rob Epstein, the platform offers free intake, automated screening, and, in many cases, same-day conversations with licensed attorneys. The idea is simple: reduce the friction between a client’s first request for help and an actual legal discussion. In this interview, Epstein explains how the system works, where artificial intelligence fits into the process, and what problems the company is trying to address in the broader legal system

Q: When you say you want lawyers to be “as accessible as Wi-Fi,” what does that mean in practical terms?

A: It’s a way of describing speed and availability. Someone dealing with a workplace dispute, a serious injury, or an immigration issue should be able to move from an online form or phone call to a real conversation with counsel in hours, not weeks. YesLawyer is structured so that a client begins with a free case evaluation, goes through automated conflict checks and basic screening, and, in many instances, speaks with a lawyer the same day.

Q: How does the process work once someone contacts the platform?

A: We use a structured workflow. It starts with a short questionnaire and an initial conversation to capture basic facts. That information feeds into conflict checks and internal review. The system then proposes a match with a licensed attorney and provides a calendar link for a virtual consultation, often within 24 hours. After the meeting, the client receives a written legal plan outlining next steps, deadlines, and estimated fees.

Q: Where does artificial intelligence fit into that process, and where does it stop?

A: AI is used for organizing and routing information, not for giving legal advice. It helps with conflict checks at scale, case categorization, and structured summaries so attorneys can focus on the substance of the matter. Every consultation is conducted by a licensed lawyer, and all decisions about strategy or next steps are made by humans.

Q: What problem is this model trying to solve in the current legal system?

A: Delay and cost are still major barriers. Many civil plaintiffs face long waits just to get a first appointment, along with high retainers and hourly billing that make early legal advice risky. We try to respond with faster consultations, flat-fee options, and financing. The idea is to remove administrative friction so lawyers spend less time on logistics and more time speaking with clients.

Q: Some critics say platforms like this blur the line between a technology company and a law firm. How do you describe YesLawyer?

A: We describe ourselves as a national, AI-enabled plaintiff firm that connects clients with independent attorneys. That structure does raise regulatory questions, especially around responsibility and oversight. We focus on licensing verification, attorney-written case plans, and clear communication about fees and services.

Q: You’ve said the main bottleneck is “systems” rather than people. What do you mean by that?

A: The issue isn’t that lawyers don’t want to help more people. It’s that the systems around them make it hard to scale their time. Intake, scheduling, and document handling take hours. Automating those parts means attorneys can handle more matters without being overwhelmed by repetitive tasks.

Q: Does this model risk favoring only the most profitable cases?

A: That’s a real concern in legal technology. Automation often works best for repeatable, high-volume disputes. Our view is that lowering administrative cost can actually make it easier to take on smaller or more complex cases that might otherwise be turned away. Whether that holds over time depends on the data.

Measuring Impact Over Time

YesLawyer’s attempt to compress the timeline between inquiry and consultation reflects broader changes in how legal services are being delivered. As artificial intelligence becomes more common in administrative work, firms are experimenting with new ways to reduce wait times and clarify costs.

The company’s early growth suggests that many clients value faster access to an initial conversation, even before considering long-term representation. Whether this platform-based model becomes widely adopted or remains one of several emerging approaches will depend on regulatory developments, lawyer participation, and measurable outcomes for clients. For now, YesLawyer’s experiment highlights a central question in modern legal practice: how quickly can help realistically be made available to the people who need it.