Business

From Startup to Success: How Venture Debt Can Help Your Business Grow

Published

2 years ago

August 1, 2023

A new kind of funding is on the upswing for startups — venture debt. According to the US Chamber of Commerce, now that venture capital is drying up, “companies of all sizes look to raise more expansion capital via this alternative form of financing.”

As success stories proliferate of entrepreneurs using this funding solution in their early stages, interest in it naturally increases. Yet, venture debt isn’t the right choice for every business.

“Venture debt can open up exciting opportunities, but the decision to take on these loans is complex,” says Jay Jung, founder and managing partner of Embarc Advisors, a corporate finance advisory firm. “Problems can crop up when startups take on debt, so it’s important to weigh all aspects of this approach carefully.”

Venture debt explained

Venture debt is similar to other types of loans in that a business founder borrows money from the lender (usually an institutional bank, private investor, or fund that specializes in venture debt) and pays it back with interest over time. Companies that have already raised venture capital but are looking for more money to fuel their growth in-between equity rounds i.e., runway extension, typically use it.

“Venture debt provides funds with a short payback period — usually between 18 months and three years,” Jung says. “Lenders work with companies based on what makes sense for them at any given point in time.”

Venture debt helps businesses bridge funding gaps. “Startups are expensive,” Jung explains. “In their early days, most businesses need to spend time building their products or services while figuring out their go-to-market motion, so they usually don’t have a lot of revenue coming in. At the same time, they still need to pay the bills: employee salaries, rent on space, and other overhead.”

Indeed, as one recent study has discovered, “47% of startup failures in 2022 were due to a lack of financing.” For this reason, successfully securing venture debt can mean the difference between a company’s success and failure.

Venture debt also offers startups the ability to grow their business. “It can be a great option for any business looking to expand its operations, hire more employees and make strategic investments in technology or marketing,” Jung says.

Traditional versus venture debt

“Venture debt differs from traditional loans in a number of critical ways,” Jung says. “Traditional lenders look at a business’s past performance when determining whether or not to approve a loan. But for many startups, there isn’t a track record of past revenue. Plenty of new businesses operate in the red for years.”

For this reason alone, a traditional loan may be out of the question for some businesses.

“With venture debt, business owners can leverage the startup’s profitable future,” Jung explains. “While a traditional bank usually makes founders guarantee repayment by staking their personal property as collateral, founders can give venture-debt investors the right to purchase shares in the future, which is called a ‘warrant.’ In this way, they can use equity stakes to entice investors and other possible lenders.”

According to Jung, venture debt attracts investors because these loans tend to have higher interest rates than traditional loans. “In my experience, interest rates for venture-debt loans usually fall between 9 and 20 percent,” he says.

Options for venture debt

Startups have three options when it comes to venture debt. The first of these is term loans. “These operate much like traditional loans,” Jung says. “The lender loans the startup funds that must be repaid with interest after a certain period.”

Another option is revenue-based financing, which is paid back through a percentage of future revenue. “These loans can either be short- or long-term,” Jung says. “The important thing is that these startups need to have an established track record of generating revenue.”

The third option is factoring. “With factoring, the lender buys your accounts receivables for less than their face value,” Jung explains. “This gives the startup immediate funds, while the investor reaps the difference between their purchase price and the full amount of the bill.”

However, Jung urges caution with this method. “I’ve seen businesses get mired in situations in which they are never able to finish loans based on factoring,” he says. “They fall into a vicious cycle of relying on the factoring company and never actually get ahead, so the true cost of this approach can be a lot higher than it might first appear.”

Maximizing your success

The benefits of venture debt are numerous. Not only can these loans help you get your startup off the ground, but they can also give you the funds needed to grow as a company and expand into new markets. In the current environment where valuations have declined, extending runway through the use of venture debt may allow a company to grow back into its valuation and avoid a down-round. Still, employing this kind of funding successfully requires care.

“If you are interested in pursuing venture debt for your business, then do your due diligence,” Jung advises. “In particular, success will depend on accurately assessing your business’s needs, choosing the exact right financing option, developing a solid plan for repayment, and following it ruthlessly.”

While these steps may seem daunting, entrepreneurs who appreciate their difficulty may well be on the right track. This is one domain in which overconfidence could prove disastrous, but the good news is that — according to Jung — there’s a way to mitigate this risk.

“If you don’t have a lot of experience with corporate finance in general and venture debt in particular, then consider getting advice from a specialist,” Jung says. “With the help of an experienced advisor, you can be confident in choosing the right option and moving your company forward with the maximum chances of success. It’s important to remember that obtaining financing is only the beginning. Managing the finance post-funding is just as important.”

Business

Royal York Property Management And Nathan Levinson On Building Stable Rental Portfolios In A Volatile Market

Published

1 week ago

December 11, 2025

Matthew Wiles

Across North America, Europe, and much of the world, rental housing is caught between two pressures. On one side are tenants facing record affordability challenges. On the other side are landlords seeing operating costs, interest payments, and regulatory complexity move in the opposite direction.

Recent analysis from Canada’s national housing agency shows how tight conditions still are. The average vacancy rate for purpose-built rentals in major Canadian centres rose to about 2.2 percent in 2024, up from 1.5 percent a year earlier, but still below the 10-year average despite the strongest growth in rental supply in more than three decades.

At the same time, higher interest rates have pushed up the cost of acquiring and financing rental buildings, which has slowed transactions and made many projects harder to pencil out.

In this environment, the question for landlords and investors is less about chasing maximum rent and more about building stability. That is where Royal York Property Management and its founder, president, and CEO Nathan Levinson have drawn attention.

From a base in Toronto, Royal York Property Management manages more than 25,000 rental properties, representing over 10 billion dollars in real estate value, and operates across Canada, the United States, and parts of Europe. Levinson also sits on a Bank of Canada policy panel focused on the rental market, where he provides data and on-the-ground insights about rent trends and landlord stress.

For many smaller property owners, his model has become a reference point for how to treat rental housing as a structured financial asset rather than a side project.

Rental housing under pressure from both sides of the balance sheet

In many countries, the basic rental story is the same. Construction of new rental housing has climbed, yet demand still runs ahead of supply in most major cities. In Canada, overall rental supply grew by more than 4 percent in 2024, the strongest increase in over thirty years, while vacancy rose only modestly.

At the same time, borrowing costs have moved sharply higher compared with the pre-pandemic period. Research shows that elevated interest rates have reduced the profitability of new multifamily deals and slowed investment activity, even as structural demand for rental housing stays strong.

For small and mid-sized landlords, that tension shows up in a simple way. Mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, and maintenance rarely move down. Rents move up more slowly, and in many jurisdictions they are constrained by regulation or market realities.

Levinson’s view is that this gap will not close on its own. Landlords who want to stay in the market need more predictable income, tighter control of costs, and clearer systems for dealing with risk.

A property management model built for volatility

Royal York Property Management did not start as an institutional platform. Levinson’s early clients were owners of single condominiums, duplexes, or small buildings who were struggling with irregular rent payments, surprise repairs, and complex rental rules.

Instead of handling each property ad hoc, he built a standardized operating model that treats every door as part of a wider portfolio. Each unit sits on a centralized platform that records rent, arrears, lease expiries, maintenance tickets, and legal actions. Owners see real-time statements and performance metrics rather than waiting for year-end reports.

That structure, combined with an internal maintenance and legal team, is designed to handle stress rather than avoid it. When markets are calm, the system may look conservative. When conditions worsen, it is what keeps owners in the black.

“Execution is everything” is how Levinson often frames it in interviews.

Turning rent into a more predictable income stream

The feature that first drew many investors to Royal York Property Management is its rental guarantee program in Ontario. Under this model, landlords receive their rent even if a tenant stops paying. RYPM takes responsibility for legal proceedings, arrears recovery, and re-leasing the unit, while the owner continues to receive income.

Independent profiles of the company describe this as one of the first large-scale rental guarantee frameworks in the Canadian market, and note that the firm manages tens of thousands of units under this structure.

The guarantee itself is closely tied to local law and does not transfer directly into every jurisdiction. The underlying logic, however, is straightforward:

Treat unpaid rent as a recurring and manageable risk rather than an occasional shock.
Price that risk into a clear product instead of handling each case informally.
Use scale, legal expertise, and data to keep default rates low and resolution times shorter.

For landlords who are facing mortgage renewals at higher interest rates, having a more stable rent stream can be the difference between holding a property and being forced to sell. That is one reason rental guarantee models have started to attract interest from investors outside Canada who are watching RYPM’s approach.

Using technology to see risk earlier

Behind the guarantee and the day-to-day operations is a technology stack that tries to surface problems before they become crises. Royal York Property Management’s internal platform uses data from payments, maintenance, and tenant behavior to flag risk signals and operational bottlenecks.

Examples include:

Tenants who move from on-time payments to repeated short delays.
Units where small repair tickets point to a larger capital issue ahead.
Buildings where complaint volumes suggest service gaps or staffing problems.

Rather than treating these as isolated events, the system aggregates patterns across thousands of units. That allows management to decide whether a problem is individual, building-specific, or systemic.

Levinson has also pushed this data outward. As a member of the Bank of Canada’s rental policy panel, he provides anonymized information on rent collection, defaults, and renewal behavior, which feeds into broader discussions about financial stability and housing policy.

The same data that protects a landlord’s cash flow in one building helps central bankers understand how higher rates are affecting thousands of households.

Why the Canadian case matters for global landlords

Several recent reports underline how closely rental markets are now tied to national economic performance. Tight rental supply and high rents are feeding inflation in many economies. At the same time, higher borrowing costs are discouraging new construction, which risks prolonging shortages.

This feedback loop is especially hard on small landlords. Many own only one or two properties and have limited room to absorb higher mortgage payments or extended vacancies. Analysts in Canada and abroad have warned that some owners are at risk of default as their loans reset at higher rates.

In that context, the Royal York Property Management model offers three lessons that travel across borders:

Standardization protects both sides. Clear processes for screening, rent collection, maintenance, and legal steps reduce surprises for owners and tenants at the same time.
Risk pooling is more efficient than one-off crises. Handling arrears, legal disputes, and vacancies inside a structured system is less costly than improvising each time.
Operational data belongs in policy conversations. When policymakers have access to real rental data rather than only mortgage statistics, interventions can be better targeted.

It is not an accident that Levinson’s work now sits at the intersection of private property management and public financial policy.

What everyday landlords can borrow from the Royal York playbook

Most landlords will not build a 25,000-unit management platform. Many will never interact with a central bank. The core ideas behind Nathan Levinson’s approach are still accessible to smaller owners that manage a handful of properties.

Three practices stand out.

First, treat every rental unit as part of a simple portfolio. That means using a consistent template to track rent, arrears, expenses, and vacancy days for each property, then reviewing it on a schedule instead of only when something goes wrong.

Second, write down the rules for risk in advance. Late-payment steps, repayment plans, documentation standards, and maintenance response times should exist on paper, not only in memory. Royal York’s experience suggests that clear rules reduce conflict, because everyone knows what will happen next.

Third, invest in service as a protective layer. Multiple independent profiles of RYPM point out that faster response times and transparent communication reduce tenant turnover and protect building condition, which in turn supports long-term returns.

For landlords and investors trying to navigate today’s volatile rental markets, the message from Royal York Property Management and Nathan Levinson is surprisingly simple. You cannot control interest rates or national housing policy. You can control how organized your portfolio is, how clearly you manage risk, and how consistent your operations feel to the people who live in your buildings.

For many, that shift from improvisation to structure is what will decide whether their rental properties remain a source of wealth or turn into a source of stress.