Connect with us

Health

How AGACNPs tailor risk assessments for patients with chronic health problems

mm

Published

on

Risk assessments are a great tool for creating treatment plans for patients with chronic health problems. In North America, there is a large population of aging adults. More people are living longer with chronic conditions than ever before. It is important for doctors and nurses to consider pre-existing conditions and current overall health before any treatments or prescriptions are offered to a patient.

Family history

Some conditions have genetic links. For example, heart disease, diabetes and cancer may be more likely to occur in individuals who have family members who have suffered from the same conditions. This is particularly true if a patient has a parent, grandparent, aunt or uncle who has the condition. 

Patients should be encouraged to ask about their family health history if they are unsure or unable to answer some questions.

Previous health history

It is important for adult-gerontology acute care nurse practitioners (AGACNPs) to carefully review a patient’s previous health history. This is especially true if a patient is new to a practice or health system and has limited health records. Older individuals may have fairly extensive health records, but they may lack detail or be hard to obtain if they were recorded before digital records were the normal way of recording information.

Health history questions should include any mental or physical illnesses or conditions. A distinction should be made between patient-provided information and conditions that have been diagnosed by a doctor.

Lifestyle and habits

Personal choices have a lot to do with health and risk levels. AGACNPs should ask patients about their diet and exercise habits. Are they sedentary for a large portion of the day due to their job? Do they eat regular meals, and what do they consist of?

Alcohol and drug use must be addressed. This is a tricky matter because patients who are using any substance at all are likely to say they are using it less or not at all out of fear of judgment or concerns about legal repercussions. AGACNPs should consider asking these questions in a non-judgmental way. Explaining that you are there to help, not complicate matters for them, is a good start. 

Pre-existing conditions

Sometimes, those with chronic health issues have other conditions that are already documented, which can cause them to be at increased risk for other health issues. For example, if a patient has high blood pressure, they are at higher risk for cardiac problems, including strokes and heart attacks.

A complete physical exam and lab work once per year can help diagnose and catch problems before they advance in severity. This allows patients to lead healthier and longer lives while reducing the cost of healthcare over their lifetime.

Preventative care visits may seem like extra trips for people who want to avoid doctor visits, but the truth is that over the years, they prevent extra visits overall since patients stay healthier.

Risk assessments support reasonable and realistic treatment plans

Creating a proper treatment plan means knowing as much as possible about a patient. Risk assessments help determine what factors must be considered to provide the patient with the highest level of care. 

Risk assessments also help to develop an excellent preventative care routine for each patient. When you know that you are at increased risk for specific conditions, preventive health screenings and testing can be tailored to fit your needs.

Risk assessments minimize unsatisfactory treatment results

There are a lot of treatments and medications out there that help many patients, but some treatments are not always suitable for everyone. Medical teams need to know all the risk factors that may apply to a patient before they decide to proceed with something as simple as trying a prescription medication.

Risk assessments may also help determine whether a patient needs to take preventative medications or even have preventive procedures if the risk is serious enough.

Risk assessments support safe surgeries

Surgical procedures can vary in seriousness and recovery time. Patients must be assessed to ensure they are considered healthy enough to do well throughout surgery. Before surgery, a patient is assessed for risk factors related to anesthesia. If there is a high probability of a blood transfusion being needed, then questions and tests will be conducted to make sure a patient is a good candidate for a transfusion.

Knowing all the pre-existing factors will allow the surgical care team to perform their job effectively and ensure patient safety and quality of care.

Adult care nurses help assess older patients

Adult-gerontology acute care nurse practitioners are specialists who help older adults learn to live with chronic conditions. They are responsible for assessing and recommending treatments based on the risk assessments they conduct. Reputable institutions such as Rockhurst University offer an accredited MSN AGACNP program that is designed for working nurses who want to advance their careers and choose an in-demand specialization. 

The program can be completed in as little as six semesters as a full-time student and eight semesters part-time. Clinical placement services are included so you can finish your degree on time and concentrate on gaining practical experience while having a great mentor to guide you.

Conclusion

Risk assessments are important for adult patients battling chronic conditions. It is essential that medical workers take the time to conduct a proper risk assessment every time a patient enters their practice or is diagnosed with a different condition.

AGACNPs are needed to help care for the large population of aging adults living with chronic conditions. Now is a great time for nurses to consider an advanced degree because they have the option of completing coursework online while continuing in their current position as an RN. 

Michelle has been a part of the journey ever since Bigtime Daily started. As a strong learner and passionate writer, she contributes her editing skills for the news agency. She also jots down intellectual pieces from categories such as science and health.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Health

The Scientist as Storyteller: How Steven Quay Makes Complex Medicine Relatable

mm

Published

on

Scientific discovery often struggles to reach the people it is meant to serve. The distance between research and public understanding can be vast. For most scientists, publishing in peer-reviewed journals is the endpoint. For Dr. Steven Quay, it is only the beginning. His career has been defined not just by what he has discovered, but by how he communicates it. 

Scientific trust today faces growing skepticism and misinformation spreads faster than facts, Quay has embraced a rare role. He is both a scientist and a storyteller. His ability to bridge the technical and the human is what makes his voice resonate across disciplines, institutions, and communities.

Writing as a Lens into the Human Side of Science

One of the clearest examples of Quay’s narrative instinct lies in his writing. He has authored three major books, each rooted in a different part of his life and expertise. Together, they show how a medical researcher can also be an accessible public thinker.

In Stay Safe: A Physician’s Guide to Survive Coronavirus, published June 5, 2020, during the first days of the pandemic, Quay offered plainspoken, evidence-based guidance on protecting oneself and one’s family. It was not framed as a political statement or a policy directive. It was personal and grounded in the daily realities people faced. He wrote it not just as a scientist, but as someone who wanted to help others navigate a frightening time with clarity and calm.

His second book, The Origin of the Virus, tackled a more complex and controversial subject: the question of how SARS-CoV-2 emerged. Rather than speculate, Quay walked readers through the scientific evidence with the kind of transparency that is often lacking in public discourse. The tone was methodical, never alarmist. What set the book apart was its balance, engaging to a lay reader, yet rigorous enough to be taken seriously by professionals.

Then there is A Ride Through Northville, a deeply personal departure from the world of virology and oncology. Here, Quay revisits his childhood in Michigan, capturing the streets, friendships, and quiet moments that shaped him long before he entered a lab. The structure of the book mimics the experience of riding a bike through town, evoking memory not as a chronology, but as a sensory journey. For a scientist whose career has involved high-stakes research and global debates, this book offers a rare window into the reflective, grounded person behind the work.

Speaking Clearly Without Speaking Down

Quay’s communication skill is not limited to the written word. He has also become a frequent guest on health-focused podcasts and a speaker at public science forums. His TEDx talk on breast cancer prevention is one of the most viewed videos on the subject, and for good reason. He does not rely on drama or abstract theory. Instead, he explains mammographic density, hormonal risk, and clinical trial design in a way that makes the science both comprehensible and actionable.

In interviews, Quay has a habit of slowing things down. He avoids jargon unless he defines it. He is comfortable saying, “We don’t know yet,” which, in the realm of public science, is a kind of honesty that builds trust. He often discusses Atossa Therapeutics’ trials in plain terms, describing how experimental drugs like (Z)-endoxifen might help certain patients respond better to treatment. He emphasizes that these are ongoing studies, not marketing pitches, which sets him apart from many biotech executives.

Educating the Public Without Oversimplifying

One of the challenges of public-facing science is resisting the urge to oversimplify. Many well-intentioned scientists flatten complexity to fit the constraints of social media or mainstream news. Quay does not follow that path. He explains mechanisms and hypotheses with nuance, trusting that readers and listeners are capable of understanding more than they are often given credit for.

His social media presence reflects the same philosophy. He shares articles and research updates, but rarely with alarm or bravado. When he comments on current medical debates, he tends to lead with evidence rather than opinion. That steady tone has earned him a following that spans across ideological and professional divides.

During the pandemic, this approach stood out. While others chased headlines, Quay focused on distilling evolving guidance into practical advice. He acknowledged the limits of current knowledge, updated his views as new data emerged, and emphasized science as an iterative process. His voice became one that many people turned to not for certainty, but for clarity.

A Scientist’s Responsibility Beyond the Lab

Quay has often said that science does not exist in isolation. It is part of society. That belief informs why he writes, speaks, and engages in public discourse as actively as he does. He sees the scientist’s role not just as a producer of knowledge, but as a custodian of its meaning.

He has testified before the U.S. Congress and advised the State Department, not as a politician but as a physician-scientist committed to accuracy. In each case, his contribution has been grounded in data but shaped by a recognition of the human implications of policy and research.

This is especially evident in his work on breast cancer. By advocating for better screening tools and more personalized treatments, Quay speaks not only to clinicians and investors but to women facing real fears about their health. He explains the science behind mammographic density and hormonal modulation not just with charts, but with stories about what those risks mean in someone’s life.

Storytelling as a Form of Service

What makes Quay’s communication style compelling is that it never feels performative. He is not branding himself or building a media empire. He is doing what he believes scientists should do: make their work useful.

In every form of his storytelling, from the deeply personal to the technically specific, there is a throughline of responsibility. He understands that science touches people’s lives in ways that go far beyond the lab. For him, that means speaking clearly, writing honestly, and never underestimating the audience.

Continue Reading

Trending