Connect with us

World

Mega casino projects that failed in Spain

mm

Published

on

Beautiful casino megaprojects such as the Kingdom of Don Quixote, Gran Scala, and Eurovegas never saw the light of day in Spain. Barcelona World casino, on the other hand, supports a thread of hope that is becoming increasingly fragile. Why? There are no specific reasons for such fiasco, but there are some similar business strategies that could lead to bankruptcy. Another reason that may have affected the giants is a decline in interest among people to visit gambling establishments since online gambling clubs always at hand. For example, you can play top gambling games just by clicking on this link – www.casinonic.com/en-AU/games/top. Anyway, let’s take a look at each casino separately.

Best online gambling games
Kingdom of Don Quixote project in Ciudad Real

The Kingdom of Don Quixote project was presented in 2005. This casino was supposed to have an area of 10,000 square meters, a luxury hotel, a theater for 3,000 spectators, a golf course, 7,000 rooms, and 7,000 permanent jobs. For seasonal work should have involved 11,000 workers. This casino received funding from the gaming giant Caesars, which was supposed to operate the casino under the Harrah’s brand. That would be Las Vegas in Ciudad Real.

Negotiations are at an impasse and deadlines have not been met. On December 1, 2011, a meeting of shareholders declared bankruptcy. Caesars said it lost $ 27.1 million on this project.

The Don Quixote project has always been associated with another fiasco – Don Quixote Airport. The total debt amounted to 200 million euros. Sergio Alvarez, president of the Board of Shareholders, then told the local newspaper La Tribuna de Ciudad Real that his goal was to attract investors, seek funding and promote the project.

Gran Scala project between Zaragoza and Huesca

In December 2007, the government of Aragon introduced the Gran Scala project. The promotion company was International Leisure Development (ILD), which promised 32 casinos, seven theme parks, hotels for 25,000 guests, 250 stores, 26,000 direct jobs and nearly 65,000 seasonal. In total, investments amounted to 17,000 million euros.

The place chosen for the development of the Grand Scale project was the Monegros Desert, located between Zaragoza and Huesca. To implement this project, 4,000 hectares of land was needed.

Due to such a large amount of land, plots were acquired from private individuals. The conditions were as follows: owners received from 4 to 10% advance payment. If the investor did not pay the balance until February 2012, then the land was returned to the owners. And so, it happened. International Leisure Development did not pay the balance and the project itself remained only on paper.

Eurovegas Project in Madrid

In 2010, Las Vegas Sands began to be interested in opening a mega-casino complex in Europe. The owner of this company is billionaire Sheldon Adelson. The location of the future casino was considered either in Barcelona or in Madrid. Adelson said that it was Spain that was most suitable for hosting his “Gambling Eden”. He planned investment of 18 million euros. 250,000 thousand permanent and seasonal jobs, 12 hotels and restaurants with the ability to serve 50,000 people, several golf courses and 6 casinos with a large area.

Two years later, it was decided that the casino will be located in the capital of Spain. Three options were considered: Paracuellos del Jarama, Valdecarros and Alcorcon. The latter was chosen as the location.

Everything seemed to go smoothly, but delays, changes in the initial numbers, and requests for changes in laws began to appear. So, until 2013, after the resignation of Esperance Aguirre, the project fell apart.

So why these megaprojects closed?

The main groups opposed to the implementation of casino megaprojects were left-wing parties, environmental associations, and organizations against gambling. And the arguments are as follows:

  • Environmental Impact: This is a model that is contrary to sustainable development.
  • Gambling-based economic specialization.
  • Increase negative values.
  • The emergence of a marginal environment: drugs, mafia, and prostitution.
  • Low skilled labor.
  • Changes in laws: projects required changes in the law to meet the interests of the investor. For example, the government of Aragon approved the law on recreation centers of large capacity. For Eurovegas, it was necessary to amend the Tobacco Act, and in the case of Barcelona Word, a tax reduction was approved.

The idea of Bigtime Daily landed this engineer cum journalist from a multi-national company to the digital avenue. Matthew brought life to this idea and rendered all that was necessary to create an interactive and attractive platform for the readers. Apart from managing the platform, he also contributes his expertise in business niche.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World

Criminal probe focussed on Mehtas shipping business

mm

Published

on

From Monitoring Desk

DUBAI: An Asian family linked with the shipping business is facing criminal investigation in several jurisdictions including in Dubai and Far East where the family’s companies are under active investigation now, according to the authorities in three countries.

Sanjay and Gaurav Mehta, through their companies Best Oasis Ltd in Dubai and Priya Blue Industries in Gujarat, are facing investigations over money-laundering suspicions and suspected links to the Russian oil sector, sanctioned by the western countries, sources shared.

Sanjay and Gaurav Mehta, through their companies Best Oasis Ltd in Dubai and Priya Blue Industries in Gujarat have projected an image of environmental responsibility in ship recycling. They have tout certifications, attend global summits, and positioned themselves as ESG-compliant but their business practices have come under intense probe now. Their operations reportedly involve dismantling high-risk ships, using cash transactions, and leveraging political connections to avoid accountability, a source shared looking into the companies’ affairs. The investigation is being conducted in Dubai and the Far East.

The investigators are looking at the Mehtas operations dating back to 2006 when they came to attention of the law enforcement for the first time. Priya Blue dismantled the “Blue Lady” in 2006, a vessel containing over 1,200 tons of asbestos and radioactive waste, despite protests and objections from Greenpeace. Later, the “Exxon Valdez,” notorious for a major oil spill, was renamed “Oriental Nicety” and dismantled by the Mehtas in Gujarat, drawing international attention. In recent years, their transactions have become less conspicuous but reportedly more hazardous.

In 2025, Best Oasis allegedly acquired and dismantled at least four vessels linked to sanctioned entities, including Iranian and Houthi-controlled networks. These weren’t obscure ships; they were designated under U.S. terrorism sanctions for their involvement in oil smuggling and arms transport. According to investigators, here are the details of the sanctioned ships dismantled by Best Oasis in 2025: IMO: 9155808, Name: NOLAN (SOLAN), Sanction: SDN (SDGT), Beaching: 31 Jan 2025, Plot 16; IMO: 9221657, Name: BLUEFINS, Sanction: SDN (SDGT); Beaching: 26 Feb 2025, Plot 16; IMO: 9105085, Name: CONTRACT II, Sanction: SDN risk, Beaching: Arrived mid-2025, Plot 27; IMO: 9209300, Name: GAMA II, Sanction: SDN (SDGT); and Beaching: Pending/Planned, Plot 34

All four vessels were reportedly dismantled in Alang on plots leased by proxy firms connected to the Mehtas. These short-term leases, approved on a ship-by-ship basis by the Gujarat Maritime Board, reportedly make regulatory oversight nearly impossible. Once dismantling is complete, plot registrations often lapse, leaving no long-term record, according to documents shared by the investigators in Dubai.

Rahul Mistry, a shipping compliance researcher, noted this as a growing pattern: “This is a pattern we’ve seen more frequently in the last two years   sanctioned hulls arriving under the radar, processed fast, with no digital trace.”

Payments for these vessels reportedly bypassed normal financial channels. According to sources familiar with the deals, transactions were settled in cash, either on-site or through offshore handlers. One source described entire ship values being paid in foreign currency bundles, avoiding Indian and Dubai banking disclosures, said one of the investigators familiar with the matter.

A retired port official Mr. Akin Yadav, familiar with Alang  and Gujarat Maritime Board approvals stated that short-term leases are routinely used to avoid scrutiny, adding, “It was never meant to be a permanent workaround. But it’s become one.”

Political connections also reportedly play a role. Union Minister Mansukh Mandaviya and Gujarat State Minister Jitu Vaghani have been linked to approvals granted for Best Oasis and its proxies. While there’s no direct evidence of personal gain, sources allege that both men used their influence to expedite approvals, slow down inquiries, and shield the companies from enforcement.

Despite these activities in India, Best Oasis is expanding under new branding. A recent joint venture in Japan with Hiroshi Abe is being marketed as a clean, regionally responsible recycling partner for Japanese shipowners.

Mariko Fujita, a Tokyo-based maritime consultant, observed, “They’re presenting themselves as a new entity with no reference to past controversies. But none of the underlying ownership or structure has changed.”

In Alang, the situation reportedly remains much the same. Plot numbers are reassigned, cash continues to circulate and the same network of breakers and handlers is reportedly involved. Individuals like Jayant Vanani (also known as Budhabhai Patel) and Ramesh Mendapara are frequently named in connection with specific beachings, including “Contract II” and “GAMA II.” Both have been previously linked to other shadow transactions involving distressed or sanctioned tonnage.

Several yards allegedly connected to Best Oasis, including Shantamani Ship Breakers and Sai Baba Ship Breakers, reportedly operate with minimal inspection, despite numerous reports of irregularities in worker safety, hazardous waste disposal, and compliance with Indian scrapping codes.

This system, according to multiple sources, appears to be intentionally designed to operate in plain sight with just enough paperwork to pass basic scrutiny but not enough to trigger meaningful enforcement. There is no indication that regulatory bodies including customs, port health officers, or environmental oversight panels have conducted full inspections of any of the sanctioned vessels listed. Most were reportedly cleared and dismantled within days of arrival.

Rahul Mistry said: “This isn’t merely a loophole; it’s reportedly a business model. Best Oasis and Priya Blue are allegedly running a high-volume, low-visibility operation that filters sanctioned, end-of-life ships through legal instruments to appear legitimate on paper. This reportedly involves routing untaxed funds and shielded actors through a well-connected political and industrial network. As global scrutiny of ESG practices intensifies, many of these activities are allegedly being whitewashed through new partnerships and branding, but the underlying mechanisms reportedly remain unchanged.”

Continue Reading

Trending