Connect with us

World

Mega casino projects that failed in Spain

mm

Published

on

Beautiful casino megaprojects such as the Kingdom of Don Quixote, Gran Scala, and Eurovegas never saw the light of day in Spain. Barcelona World casino, on the other hand, supports a thread of hope that is becoming increasingly fragile. Why? There are no specific reasons for such fiasco, but there are some similar business strategies that could lead to bankruptcy. Another reason that may have affected the giants is a decline in interest among people to visit gambling establishments since online gambling clubs always at hand. For example, you can play top gambling games just by clicking on this link – www.casinonic.com/en-AU/games/top. Anyway, let’s take a look at each casino separately.

Best online gambling games
Kingdom of Don Quixote project in Ciudad Real

The Kingdom of Don Quixote project was presented in 2005. This casino was supposed to have an area of 10,000 square meters, a luxury hotel, a theater for 3,000 spectators, a golf course, 7,000 rooms, and 7,000 permanent jobs. For seasonal work should have involved 11,000 workers. This casino received funding from the gaming giant Caesars, which was supposed to operate the casino under the Harrah’s brand. That would be Las Vegas in Ciudad Real.

Negotiations are at an impasse and deadlines have not been met. On December 1, 2011, a meeting of shareholders declared bankruptcy. Caesars said it lost $ 27.1 million on this project.

The Don Quixote project has always been associated with another fiasco – Don Quixote Airport. The total debt amounted to 200 million euros. Sergio Alvarez, president of the Board of Shareholders, then told the local newspaper La Tribuna de Ciudad Real that his goal was to attract investors, seek funding and promote the project.

Gran Scala project between Zaragoza and Huesca

In December 2007, the government of Aragon introduced the Gran Scala project. The promotion company was International Leisure Development (ILD), which promised 32 casinos, seven theme parks, hotels for 25,000 guests, 250 stores, 26,000 direct jobs and nearly 65,000 seasonal. In total, investments amounted to 17,000 million euros.

The place chosen for the development of the Grand Scale project was the Monegros Desert, located between Zaragoza and Huesca. To implement this project, 4,000 hectares of land was needed.

Due to such a large amount of land, plots were acquired from private individuals. The conditions were as follows: owners received from 4 to 10% advance payment. If the investor did not pay the balance until February 2012, then the land was returned to the owners. And so, it happened. International Leisure Development did not pay the balance and the project itself remained only on paper.

Eurovegas Project in Madrid

In 2010, Las Vegas Sands began to be interested in opening a mega-casino complex in Europe. The owner of this company is billionaire Sheldon Adelson. The location of the future casino was considered either in Barcelona or in Madrid. Adelson said that it was Spain that was most suitable for hosting his “Gambling Eden”. He planned investment of 18 million euros. 250,000 thousand permanent and seasonal jobs, 12 hotels and restaurants with the ability to serve 50,000 people, several golf courses and 6 casinos with a large area.

Two years later, it was decided that the casino will be located in the capital of Spain. Three options were considered: Paracuellos del Jarama, Valdecarros and Alcorcon. The latter was chosen as the location.

Everything seemed to go smoothly, but delays, changes in the initial numbers, and requests for changes in laws began to appear. So, until 2013, after the resignation of Esperance Aguirre, the project fell apart.

So why these megaprojects closed?

The main groups opposed to the implementation of casino megaprojects were left-wing parties, environmental associations, and organizations against gambling. And the arguments are as follows:

  • Environmental Impact: This is a model that is contrary to sustainable development.
  • Gambling-based economic specialization.
  • Increase negative values.
  • The emergence of a marginal environment: drugs, mafia, and prostitution.
  • Low skilled labor.
  • Changes in laws: projects required changes in the law to meet the interests of the investor. For example, the government of Aragon approved the law on recreation centers of large capacity. For Eurovegas, it was necessary to amend the Tobacco Act, and in the case of Barcelona Word, a tax reduction was approved.

The idea of Bigtime Daily landed this engineer cum journalist from a multi-national company to the digital avenue. Matthew brought life to this idea and rendered all that was necessary to create an interactive and attractive platform for the readers. Apart from managing the platform, he also contributes his expertise in business niche.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World

TRG Chairman Khaishgi and CEO Aslam implicated in $150 million fraud

mm

Published

on

In a scathing 52-page decision, the Sindh High Court has found that TRG Pakistan’s management was acting fraudulently and that Bermuda-based Greentree Holdings historic and prospective purchase of TRG shares were illegal, fraudulent and oppressive. 

The Sindh High Court has further directed TRGP to immediately hold board elections that have been overdue and illegally withheld by the existing board since January 14, 2025. 

In the landmark ruling, the Sindh High Court has blocked the attempted takeover of TRG Pakistan Limited by Greentree Holdings, declaring that the shares acquired by Greentree, nearly 30% of TRG’s stock, were unlawfully financed using TRG’s funds in violation of Section 86(2) of the Companies Act 2017.

“Having concluded that the affairs of TRGP are being conducted in an unlawful and fraudulent manner and in a manner oppressive to members such as the Petitioner (Zia Chishti), the case falls for corrective orders under sub-section (2) of section 286 of the Companies Act,” Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry concluded.

The case was brought by TRGP former CEO and founder Pakistani-American technology entrepreneur Zia Chishti against TRG Pakistan, its associate TRG International and TRG International’s wholly-owned shell company Greentree Limited.  In addition, the case named AKD Securities for managing Greentree’s illegal tender offer as well as various regulators requiring that they act to perform their regulatory duties.

The case centred around the dispute that shell company Greentree Limited was fraudulently using TRG Pakistan’s own funds to purchase TRG Pakistan’s shares in order to give control to Zia Chishti’s former partners Mohammed Khaishgi, Hasnain Aslam and Pinebridge Investments.

According to the case facts, the Chairman of TRG Pakistan Mohammed Khaishgi and the CEO of TRG Pakistan Hasnain Aslam masterminded the $150 million fraud. They did so together with Hong Kong based fund manager Pinebridge who has two nominees on TRG Pakistan’s board, Mr. John Leone and Mr. Patrick McGinnis.

According to the court papers, Khaishgi, Aslam, Leone, and McGinnis set up a shell company called Greentree which they secretly controlled and from which they started buying up shares of TRG Pakistan.  The fraud was that Greentree was using TRG Pakistan’s funds itself.  The idea was to give Khaishgi, Aslam, Leone, and McGinnis control over TRG Pakistan even though they owned less than 1% of the company, lawyers of the petitioner told the court. 

This was all part of a broader battle for control over TRG Pakistan that is raging between Khaishgi, Aslam, Leone, and McGinnis on one side and TRG Pakistan founder Zia Chishti on the other side.  Zia Chishti has been trying to retake control of TRG Pakistan after he was forced to resign in 2021 based on sexual misconduct allegations made by a former employee of his.  This year those allegations were shown to be without basis in litigation that Chishti launched in the United Kingdom against The Telegraph newspaper which had printed the allegations.  The Telegraph was forced to apologize for 13 separate articles it published about Chishti and paid him damages and legal costs.

After Chishti resigned in 2021, Khaishgi, Aslam, Leone, and McGinnis moved to take total control over TRG Pakistan and its various subsidiaries including TRG International and to block out Chishti.  The Sindh High Court’s ruling today has reversed that effort, ruling the scheme fraudulent, illegal, and oppressive.  

It now appears that Zia Chishti will take control of TRG Pakistan in short order when elections are called.  He and his family are now the largest shareholders with over 30% interest.  He is closely followed by companies related to Jahangir Siddiqui & Company which have over a 20% interest.  The result appears to be a complete vindication for Zia Chishti and damning for his rivals Aslam, Khaishgi, Leone, and McGinnis who have been ruled to have been conducting a fraud.  

TRG Pakistan’s share price declined by over 8% on the news on heavy volume.  Market experts say that this was because the tender offer at Rs 75 was gone and that now shares would trade closer to their natural value.  Presently the shares are trading at Rs 59 per share.

According to the court ruling, since 2021, shell company Greentree had purchased approximately 30% of TRG shares using $80 million of TRG’s own money, which means that that the directors of TRG Pakistan allowed company assets to be funneled through offshore affiliates TRG International and Greentree for acquiring TRG’s shares – a move deemed both fraudulent and oppressive to minority shareholders.  The Sindh High Court also found illegal Greentree’s further attempt to purchase another 35% of TRG shares using another $70 million of TRG’s money in a tender offer. 

The ruling is a major victory for the tech entrepreneur Zia Chishti against his former partners and the legal ruling paves the way for him to take control of TRG in a few weeks.

Continue Reading

Trending