The FDA deserves credit for ensuring high patient safety standards. However, there is no ignoring the hassle medical device manufacturers go through when submitting 510K applications. They spend hours collecting documents and data from multiple departments only to face a 36% prospect of having their application rejected.

While there is no formula to always getting your submissions cleared by the FDA, you can increase your chances of approval and avoid delivery delays and unnecessary stoppages by ironing out things on your end. Here are some of the most common mistakes manufacturers make that you can easily avoid:

1. Losing track of your product’s regulatory history

Your company ought to know its product’s regulatory history in the U.S., since that’s what 510Ks are based on. Unfortunately for most companies, poor data-keeping leads to loss of important information resulting in a bitter clash with the FDA. No matter the history of your product, it’s good to keep data where you can access it and not likely to lose it. A dedicated clinical metadata repository software tool, such as Formedix Ryze can help you take control of the key challenges associated with keeping and organizing data.

2. Using incorrect FDA templates

Up in the FDA checklist is the correct use of their templates. The agency requires that each section of all 510K submissions be based on an FDA-issued template. Most manufacturers remember this but then forget how rapidly the FDA updates these templates. While using an older template doesn’t automatically render your submission void, it increases your chances of leaving out some data, which you can’t get away with. For this reason, it’s good to confirm that the template on your hands is the latest issued by the FDA before drafting your application.

3. Data irregularity

The FDA requires that you be consistent with the information you provide if it appears multiple times in your application. If there is a discrepancy in your wording, your application will likely be flagged and even rejected. So while keeping your intent consistent, make a point of doing the same with your wording for the sake of your application’s approval.

4. Skipping sections

A typical 510K application form has 20 sections, some of which may not apply to your device. For most manufacturers, irrelevant sections include Electromagnetic Compatibility and Electrical Safety, Performance Testing and Proposed Labeling, Disclosure Statement or Financial Certification, and Class 3 Summary and Certification. If any of the sections don’t apply to you, it is required that you confirm it in writing.

5. Choosing an incorrect predicate (comparison) device

The FDA will treat your device like they did a previously cleared one, meaning you have to identify a device whose parameters match those of yours. Your predicate of choice should bear similarity in design, size, materials, packaging, indications for use, and other considerations, failure to which you will draw out the review process, and even risk rejection. For instance, if your device requires sterilization before use, while the predicate is supplied sterilized, the FDA will ask for more information before getting on with the review process.

6. Failing to comply with the Refusal to Accept provisions

Nearly 90 percent of all rejected submissions are tossed out before being reviewed by a human. This is because they don’t tick off the Refusal To Accept (RTA) checklist, which outlines across-the-board prerequisites. Meeting the RTA requirements simply means your device is worthy of an FDA review and has a realistic chance of being cleared.

7. Misunderstanding the point of a 510K submission

The 510 (k) has evolved quite remarkably over the years. Some time back, it was an endless series of paperwork submissions; now, it’s a streamlined affair that makes maximum use of mainstream contemporary technology. In all that, one thing remains the same: the purpose of the 510K, which is clearance through association or clearance for devices similar to other previously cleared devices.

Failure to understand that can have you wondering why the FDA is hard on you. As stated above, you should have a predicate device at the ready or even model your device on an existing one. That is not to say you should shy from being creative. However, if you want it easy with the FDA, you have to make it easy for them first.

Endnote

If you have been struggling to meet the requirements for a 510K clearance, you’re in good company. The process requires time, manpower, data, and a ton of resilience. It doesn’t have to be a hassle, though. By avoiding the above mistakes, you can massively simplify the process and speed up the review process.