Connect with us

Business

5 Best Practices for Operational Risk Management

mm

Published

on

Managing risk prevents procedural failures from becoming tangible losses, like regulatory fines, penalties, and reputational loss. Operational risk management (ORM) protects your organization from potential threats and lessens the impact of an event, should one occur. This process involves detecting, analyzing, and mitigating risks, along with improving outcomes through better decisions. 

Since risk is an inherent part of doing business, and human error is unavoidable, it’s necessary to have a strong operational risk management strategy. 

Here are the 5 best practices for managing operational risk in your company.

  1. Use risk management software

Workiva highlights how an operational risk management tool is the first thing you need to successfully manage risk. It can be extremely difficult to thoroughly assess and mitigate risk manually because there are far too many nuances and details to track. Plus, some tools provide automation to support your needs. The right tool will provide you with a plethora of financial reporting options, compliance integrations, and will connect your data from multiple sources to make your risk-based decisions more accurate.

These days, manual data management is nearly impossible. When it comes to key risk indicators (KRIs), you can’t afford to make mistakes. By using an operational risk management tool, you’ll reduce preventable oversights and mistakes, which will help you better manage risk.

  1. Accept risk only when the benefits outweigh the potential cost

Unnecessary risks don’t provide significant value to a goal. It’s never a good idea to take on unnecessary risk because the cost can be devastating. Unfortunately, many people, especially entrepreneurs, have a personal bias that distorts judgment and limits critical analysis. 

What makes a risk unnecessary? It’s not the level of the risk that determines whether it’s worth taking, but rather, the potential benefits. Your organization might be fine taking on high risk if the benefits will outweigh the cost, both financially and otherwise.

Regardless, all major risks should be cleared by senior management and stakeholders first.

  1. Address risk at the appropriate level

Decisions will be made at every level across your organization, so make sure risk decisions are made by the right people. For instance, employees shouldn’t be making decisions that have the potential to seriously impact the company, and managers need to ensure their employees have a strong understanding regarding how much risk they can bear and when to escalate a situation to a higher-up.

  1. Plan ahead for remediation

Part of operational risk management involves planning. The decision makers in your organization should be incorporating ORM into business processes, which requires time and resources. However, this should be part of every planning and execution phase.

  1. Categorize and prioritize your risks

You’ll need to categorize and prioritize your risks to get a good idea of what actions you should take and decisions you should make. This is done with a control matrix in five basic steps:

  • Identify your risks before conducting your assessments
  • Measure risk probability
  • Assess the potential impact
  • Calculate total risk
  • Update your control matrix accordingly

Within your risk control matrix, you’ll be prioritizing risks from the following categories: 

  • People risk. These are risks caused by people and human resources management. For example, hiring the wrong people, improper training, unmotivated team members, and high turnover rates often result in errors, fraud, and other ethical actions that can harm your organization.

  • Systems risk. When internal systems fail, losses can be devastating. This can include the loss of backups, downtime for networks, and other technical errors.

  • Process risk. When internal business processes are inadequate, your business can suffer. This includes things like product design flaws and failure to meet project deadlines or deliver projects to a client’s specifications.

  • External events risk. These risks are out of your control, like storms, floods, hurricanes, fires, and even manmade problems like robberies, terrorist attacks, and wars.

  • Legal compliance risk. When your business fails to comply with internal and external compliance regulations, the risks are great. These issues often involve tax and financial accounting regulations, internal ethical codes of conduct, and any other regulations imposed by a regulatory body governing your industry.

Operational risk management is critical for success

There are many ways to make a business successful, but if you don’t manage risk, one error or incident can tear down all your hard work. The best way to manage risk is to avoid it whenever possible. However, you can’t avoid all risk, and that’s where strategic risk management comes into play. Choose the risk you’re willing to accept, mitigate the potential consequences, and continue fine-tuning your decision-making process to respond better to similar risks in the future.

The idea of Bigtime Daily landed this engineer cum journalist from a multi-national company to the digital avenue. Matthew brought life to this idea and rendered all that was necessary to create an interactive and attractive platform for the readers. Apart from managing the platform, he also contributes his expertise in business niche.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Click for Counsel: YesLawyer Wants to Make Lawyers as Accessible as Wi-Fi

mm

Published

on

Photo Courtesy of: YesLawyer

Byline: Andi Stark

For many people facing a legal problem, the most difficult part is not understanding their rights but finding a lawyer willing to speak with them in the first place. Long wait times, unclear pricing, and administrative hurdles often delay even the most basic consultations. YesLawyer, an AI-enabled plaintiff firm operating across all 50 states, is testing whether technology can shorten that gap.

Founded in 2024 by 25-year-old entrepreneur Rob Epstein, the platform offers free intake, automated screening, and, in many cases, same-day conversations with licensed attorneys. The idea is simple: reduce the friction between a client’s first request for help and an actual legal discussion. In this interview, Epstein explains how the system works, where artificial intelligence fits into the process, and what problems the company is trying to address in the broader legal system

Q: When you say you want lawyers to be “as accessible as Wi-Fi,” what does that mean in practical terms?

A: It’s a way of describing speed and availability. Someone dealing with a workplace dispute, a serious injury, or an immigration issue should be able to move from an online form or phone call to a real conversation with counsel in hours, not weeks. YesLawyer is structured so that a client begins with a free case evaluation, goes through automated conflict checks and basic screening, and, in many instances, speaks with a lawyer the same day.

Q: How does the process work once someone contacts the platform?

A: We use a structured workflow. It starts with a short questionnaire and an initial conversation to capture basic facts. That information feeds into conflict checks and internal review. The system then proposes a match with a licensed attorney and provides a calendar link for a virtual consultation, often within 24 hours. After the meeting, the client receives a written legal plan outlining next steps, deadlines, and estimated fees.

Q: Where does artificial intelligence fit into that process, and where does it stop?

A: AI is used for organizing and routing information, not for giving legal advice. It helps with conflict checks at scale, case categorization, and structured summaries so attorneys can focus on the substance of the matter. Every consultation is conducted by a licensed lawyer, and all decisions about strategy or next steps are made by humans.

Q: What problem is this model trying to solve in the current legal system?

A: Delay and cost are still major barriers. Many civil plaintiffs face long waits just to get a first appointment, along with high retainers and hourly billing that make early legal advice risky. We try to respond with faster consultations, flat-fee options, and financing. The idea is to remove administrative friction so lawyers spend less time on logistics and more time speaking with clients.

Q: Some critics say platforms like this blur the line between a technology company and a law firm. How do you describe YesLawyer?

A: We describe ourselves as a national, AI-enabled plaintiff firm that connects clients with independent attorneys. That structure does raise regulatory questions, especially around responsibility and oversight. We focus on licensing verification, attorney-written case plans, and clear communication about fees and services.

Q: You’ve said the main bottleneck is “systems” rather than people. What do you mean by that?

A: The issue isn’t that lawyers don’t want to help more people. It’s that the systems around them make it hard to scale their time. Intake, scheduling, and document handling take hours. Automating those parts means attorneys can handle more matters without being overwhelmed by repetitive tasks.

Q: Does this model risk favoring only the most profitable cases?

A: That’s a real concern in legal technology. Automation often works best for repeatable, high-volume disputes. Our view is that lowering administrative cost can actually make it easier to take on smaller or more complex cases that might otherwise be turned away. Whether that holds over time depends on the data.

Measuring Impact Over Time

YesLawyer’s attempt to compress the timeline between inquiry and consultation reflects broader changes in how legal services are being delivered. As artificial intelligence becomes more common in administrative work, firms are experimenting with new ways to reduce wait times and clarify costs.

The company’s early growth suggests that many clients value faster access to an initial conversation, even before considering long-term representation. Whether this platform-based model becomes widely adopted or remains one of several emerging approaches will depend on regulatory developments, lawyer participation, and measurable outcomes for clients. For now, YesLawyer’s experiment highlights a central question in modern legal practice: how quickly can help realistically be made available to the people who need it.

Continue Reading

Trending