Connect with us

Business

From Startup to Success: How Venture Debt Can Help Your Business Grow

mm

Published

on

A new kind of funding is on the upswing for startups — venture debt. According to the US Chamber of Commerce, now that venture capital is drying up, “companies of all sizes look to raise more expansion capital via this alternative form of financing.”

As success stories proliferate of entrepreneurs using this funding solution in their early stages, interest in it naturally increases. Yet, venture debt isn’t the right choice for every business.

“Venture debt can open up exciting opportunities, but the decision to take on these loans is complex,” says Jay Jung, founder and managing partner of Embarc Advisors, a corporate finance advisory firm. “Problems can crop up when startups take on debt, so it’s important to weigh all aspects of this approach carefully.” 

Venture debt explained

Venture debt is similar to other types of loans in that a business founder borrows money from the lender (usually an institutional bank, private investor, or fund that specializes in venture debt) and pays it back with interest over time. Companies that have already raised venture capital but are looking for more money to fuel their growth in-between equity rounds i.e., runway extension, typically use it.

“Venture debt provides funds with a short payback period — usually between 18 months and three years,” Jung says. “Lenders work with companies based on what makes sense for them at any given point in time.”

Venture debt helps businesses bridge funding gaps. “Startups are expensive,” Jung explains. “In their early days, most businesses need to spend time building their products or services while figuring out their go-to-market motion, so they usually don’t have a lot of revenue coming in. At the same time, they still need to pay the bills: employee salaries, rent on space, and other overhead.”

Indeed, as one recent study has discovered, “47% of startup failures in 2022 were due to a lack of financing.” For this reason, successfully securing venture debt can mean the difference between a company’s success and failure.

Venture debt also offers startups the ability to grow their business. “It can be a great option for any business looking to expand its operations, hire more employees and make strategic investments in technology or marketing,” Jung says.

Traditional versus venture debt

“Venture debt differs from traditional loans in a number of critical ways,” Jung says. “Traditional lenders look at a business’s past performance when determining whether or not to approve a loan. But for many startups, there isn’t a track record of past revenue. Plenty of new businesses operate in the red for years.”

For this reason alone, a traditional loan may be out of the question for some businesses.

“With venture debt, business owners can leverage the startup’s profitable future,” Jung explains. “While a traditional bank usually makes founders guarantee repayment by staking their personal property as collateral, founders can give venture-debt investors the right to purchase shares in the future, which is called a ‘warrant.’ In this way, they can use equity stakes to entice investors and other possible lenders.”

According to Jung, venture debt attracts investors because these loans tend to have higher interest rates than traditional loans. “In my experience, interest rates for venture-debt loans usually fall between 9 and 20 percent,” he says. 

Options for venture debt

Startups have three options when it comes to venture debt. The first of these is term loans. “These operate much like traditional loans,” Jung says. “The lender loans the startup funds that must be repaid with interest after a certain period.”

Another option is revenue-based financing, which is paid back through a percentage of future revenue. “These loans can either be short- or long-term,” Jung says. “The important thing is that these startups need to have an established track record of generating revenue.”

The third option is factoring. “With factoring, the lender buys your accounts receivables for less than their face value,” Jung explains. “This gives the startup immediate funds, while the investor reaps the difference between their purchase price and the full amount of the bill.”

However, Jung urges caution with this method. “I’ve seen businesses get mired in situations in which they are never able to finish loans based on factoring,” he says. “They fall into a vicious cycle of relying on the factoring company and never actually get ahead, so the true cost of this approach can be a lot higher than it might first appear.”

Maximizing your success

The benefits of venture debt are numerous. Not only can these loans help you get your startup off the ground, but they can also give you the funds needed to grow as a company and expand into new markets. In the current environment where valuations have declined, extending runway through the use of venture debt may allow a company to grow back into its valuation and avoid a down-round. Still, employing this kind of funding successfully requires care.

“If you are interested in pursuing venture debt for your business, then do your due diligence,” Jung advises. “In particular, success will depend on accurately assessing your business’s needs, choosing the exact right financing option, developing a solid plan for repayment, and following it ruthlessly.”

While these steps may seem daunting, entrepreneurs who appreciate their difficulty may well be on the right track. This is one domain in which overconfidence could prove disastrous, but the good news is that — according to Jung — there’s a way to mitigate this risk.

“If you don’t have a lot of experience with corporate finance in general and venture debt in particular, then consider getting advice from a specialist,” Jung says. “With the help of an experienced advisor, you can be confident in choosing the right option and moving your company forward with the maximum chances of success. It’s important to remember that obtaining financing is only the beginning. Managing the finance post-funding is just as important.”

Rosario is from New York and has worked with leading companies like Microsoft as a copy-writer in the past. Now he spends his time writing for readers of BigtimeDaily.com

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Click for Counsel: YesLawyer Wants to Make Lawyers as Accessible as Wi-Fi

mm

Published

on

Photo Courtesy of: YesLawyer

Byline: Andi Stark

For many people facing a legal problem, the most difficult part is not understanding their rights but finding a lawyer willing to speak with them in the first place. Long wait times, unclear pricing, and administrative hurdles often delay even the most basic consultations. YesLawyer, an AI-enabled plaintiff firm operating across all 50 states, is testing whether technology can shorten that gap.

Founded in 2024 by 25-year-old entrepreneur Rob Epstein, the platform offers free intake, automated screening, and, in many cases, same-day conversations with licensed attorneys. The idea is simple: reduce the friction between a client’s first request for help and an actual legal discussion. In this interview, Epstein explains how the system works, where artificial intelligence fits into the process, and what problems the company is trying to address in the broader legal system

Q: When you say you want lawyers to be “as accessible as Wi-Fi,” what does that mean in practical terms?

A: It’s a way of describing speed and availability. Someone dealing with a workplace dispute, a serious injury, or an immigration issue should be able to move from an online form or phone call to a real conversation with counsel in hours, not weeks. YesLawyer is structured so that a client begins with a free case evaluation, goes through automated conflict checks and basic screening, and, in many instances, speaks with a lawyer the same day.

Q: How does the process work once someone contacts the platform?

A: We use a structured workflow. It starts with a short questionnaire and an initial conversation to capture basic facts. That information feeds into conflict checks and internal review. The system then proposes a match with a licensed attorney and provides a calendar link for a virtual consultation, often within 24 hours. After the meeting, the client receives a written legal plan outlining next steps, deadlines, and estimated fees.

Q: Where does artificial intelligence fit into that process, and where does it stop?

A: AI is used for organizing and routing information, not for giving legal advice. It helps with conflict checks at scale, case categorization, and structured summaries so attorneys can focus on the substance of the matter. Every consultation is conducted by a licensed lawyer, and all decisions about strategy or next steps are made by humans.

Q: What problem is this model trying to solve in the current legal system?

A: Delay and cost are still major barriers. Many civil plaintiffs face long waits just to get a first appointment, along with high retainers and hourly billing that make early legal advice risky. We try to respond with faster consultations, flat-fee options, and financing. The idea is to remove administrative friction so lawyers spend less time on logistics and more time speaking with clients.

Q: Some critics say platforms like this blur the line between a technology company and a law firm. How do you describe YesLawyer?

A: We describe ourselves as a national, AI-enabled plaintiff firm that connects clients with independent attorneys. That structure does raise regulatory questions, especially around responsibility and oversight. We focus on licensing verification, attorney-written case plans, and clear communication about fees and services.

Q: You’ve said the main bottleneck is “systems” rather than people. What do you mean by that?

A: The issue isn’t that lawyers don’t want to help more people. It’s that the systems around them make it hard to scale their time. Intake, scheduling, and document handling take hours. Automating those parts means attorneys can handle more matters without being overwhelmed by repetitive tasks.

Q: Does this model risk favoring only the most profitable cases?

A: That’s a real concern in legal technology. Automation often works best for repeatable, high-volume disputes. Our view is that lowering administrative cost can actually make it easier to take on smaller or more complex cases that might otherwise be turned away. Whether that holds over time depends on the data.

Measuring Impact Over Time

YesLawyer’s attempt to compress the timeline between inquiry and consultation reflects broader changes in how legal services are being delivered. As artificial intelligence becomes more common in administrative work, firms are experimenting with new ways to reduce wait times and clarify costs.

The company’s early growth suggests that many clients value faster access to an initial conversation, even before considering long-term representation. Whether this platform-based model becomes widely adopted or remains one of several emerging approaches will depend on regulatory developments, lawyer participation, and measurable outcomes for clients. For now, YesLawyer’s experiment highlights a central question in modern legal practice: how quickly can help realistically be made available to the people who need it.

Continue Reading

Trending