Business

Setting the Record Straight About Gurvin Singh Dyal’s (Mr. Gurvz) Innocence in Involvement with INFINOX

Published

4 years ago

February 18, 2022

People have an affinity toward creating and consuming stories ingrained in the very core of their being. It would be safe to say that stories are what helped humans become humans, seeing how it’s stories that enabled people to transfer knowledge between generations, increasing people’s chances of dealing with whatever life threw at them. Today’s stories might not be that critical to survival, but they still have the power to affect lives, for better and for worse.

Gurvin Singh Dyal (Mr. Gurvz), a medical student turned entrepreneur and affiliate marketer, has recently found himself at the center of a story that had everything a modern narrative needs to attract attention. A group of people lost close to 4 million pounds in an investment scheme that proved to be too good to be true.

Gurvin Singh, now the CEO of Academy2Earn, had the unfortunate role of being the affiliate marketer in charge of getting people to sign up for the investment program. When the program crashed and burned, he was left holding the bag as the face of the endeavor. Since then, he’s been silent on advice from his legal team but has now decided to set the record straight on his involvement.

Taking to Instagram, Singh published his account on his role in the events and circumstances that led to many people losing their money. First, he clarified that he wasn’t an investment guru, but an affiliate marketer. He was approached by a person who worked for INFINOX, as well as a second person who he believed also worked for INFINOX but turned out to be a fellow affiliate marketer who was profiting from Gurvin Singh’s introductions to the program.

Having been presented with impressive facts and figures, Gurvin Singh decided to join the venture on an introducer agreement. The contract he signed was with a company that wasn’t the INFINOX registered in the UK, but another entity he believed operated as part of the same company. After working with them for just under four months, in October 2019 he stopped getting payments and eventually terminated his involvement, even though he retained some access to the communication channels used by investors.

As a final note, Gurvin Singh (Mr. Gurvz) made sure to clear up that he didn’t handle any money. He wrote that “all clients signed Limited Powers of Attorney provided by INFINOX, which clearly outlined who was trading on their behalf and handling their accounts,” implying that it wasn’t him.

While there’s still much left unclear about the whole situation, Singh’s account gives a couple of valuable takeaways and only adds to the cautionary tale of risks, rewards, and shady deals. While he stopped short of recounting how the situation affected his life, it’s within reason to believe that, much like the people who invested the money, Gurvin would prefer if none of this ever happened.

Business

Click for Counsel: YesLawyer Wants to Make Lawyers as Accessible as Wi-Fi

Published

1 week ago

April 1, 2026

Matthew Wiles

Photo Courtesy of: YesLawyer

Byline: Andi Stark

For many people facing a legal problem, the most difficult part is not understanding their rights but finding a lawyer willing to speak with them in the first place. Long wait times, unclear pricing, and administrative hurdles often delay even the most basic consultations. YesLawyer, an AI-enabled plaintiff firm operating across all 50 states, is testing whether technology can shorten that gap.

Founded in 2024 by 25-year-old entrepreneur Rob Epstein, the platform offers free intake, automated screening, and, in many cases, same-day conversations with licensed attorneys. The idea is simple: reduce the friction between a client’s first request for help and an actual legal discussion. In this interview, Epstein explains how the system works, where artificial intelligence fits into the process, and what problems the company is trying to address in the broader legal system

Q: When you say you want lawyers to be “as accessible as Wi-Fi,” what does that mean in practical terms?

A: It’s a way of describing speed and availability. Someone dealing with a workplace dispute, a serious injury, or an immigration issue should be able to move from an online form or phone call to a real conversation with counsel in hours, not weeks. YesLawyer is structured so that a client begins with a free case evaluation, goes through automated conflict checks and basic screening, and, in many instances, speaks with a lawyer the same day.

Q: How does the process work once someone contacts the platform?

A: We use a structured workflow. It starts with a short questionnaire and an initial conversation to capture basic facts. That information feeds into conflict checks and internal review. The system then proposes a match with a licensed attorney and provides a calendar link for a virtual consultation, often within 24 hours. After the meeting, the client receives a written legal plan outlining next steps, deadlines, and estimated fees.

Q: Where does artificial intelligence fit into that process, and where does it stop?

A: AI is used for organizing and routing information, not for giving legal advice. It helps with conflict checks at scale, case categorization, and structured summaries so attorneys can focus on the substance of the matter. Every consultation is conducted by a licensed lawyer, and all decisions about strategy or next steps are made by humans.

Q: What problem is this model trying to solve in the current legal system?

A: Delay and cost are still major barriers. Many civil plaintiffs face long waits just to get a first appointment, along with high retainers and hourly billing that make early legal advice risky. We try to respond with faster consultations, flat-fee options, and financing. The idea is to remove administrative friction so lawyers spend less time on logistics and more time speaking with clients.

Q: Some critics say platforms like this blur the line between a technology company and a law firm. How do you describe YesLawyer?

A: We describe ourselves as a national, AI-enabled plaintiff firm that connects clients with independent attorneys. That structure does raise regulatory questions, especially around responsibility and oversight. We focus on licensing verification, attorney-written case plans, and clear communication about fees and services.

Q: You’ve said the main bottleneck is “systems” rather than people. What do you mean by that?

A: The issue isn’t that lawyers don’t want to help more people. It’s that the systems around them make it hard to scale their time. Intake, scheduling, and document handling take hours. Automating those parts means attorneys can handle more matters without being overwhelmed by repetitive tasks.

Q: Does this model risk favoring only the most profitable cases?

A: That’s a real concern in legal technology. Automation often works best for repeatable, high-volume disputes. Our view is that lowering administrative cost can actually make it easier to take on smaller or more complex cases that might otherwise be turned away. Whether that holds over time depends on the data.

Measuring Impact Over Time

YesLawyer’s attempt to compress the timeline between inquiry and consultation reflects broader changes in how legal services are being delivered. As artificial intelligence becomes more common in administrative work, firms are experimenting with new ways to reduce wait times and clarify costs.

The company’s early growth suggests that many clients value faster access to an initial conversation, even before considering long-term representation. Whether this platform-based model becomes widely adopted or remains one of several emerging approaches will depend on regulatory developments, lawyer participation, and measurable outcomes for clients. For now, YesLawyer’s experiment highlights a central question in modern legal practice: how quickly can help realistically be made available to the people who need it.