Connect with us


Setting the Record Straight About Gurvin Singh Dyal’s (Mr. Gurvz) Innocence in Involvement with INFINOX




People have an affinity toward creating and consuming stories ingrained in the very core of their being. It would be safe to say that stories are what helped humans become humans, seeing how it’s stories that enabled people to transfer knowledge between generations, increasing people’s chances of dealing with whatever life threw at them. Today’s stories might not be that critical to survival, but they still have the power to affect lives, for better and for worse.

Gurvin Singh Dyal (Mr. Gurvz), a medical student turned entrepreneur and affiliate marketer, has recently found himself at the center of a story that had everything a modern narrative needs to attract attention. A group of people lost close to 4 million pounds in an investment scheme that proved to be too good to be true.

Gurvin Singh, now the CEO of Academy2Earn, had the unfortunate role of being the affiliate marketer in charge of getting people to sign up for the investment program. When the program crashed and burned, he was left holding the bag as the face of the endeavor. Since then, he’s been silent on advice from his legal team but has now decided to set the record straight on his involvement.

Taking to Instagram, Singh published his account on his role in the events and circumstances that led to many people losing their money. First, he clarified that he wasn’t an investment guru, but an affiliate marketer. He was approached by a person who worked for INFINOX, as well as a second person who he believed also worked for INFINOX but turned out to be a fellow affiliate marketer who was profiting from Gurvin Singh’s introductions to the program.

Having been presented with impressive facts and figures, Gurvin Singh decided to join the venture on an introducer agreement. The contract he signed was with a company that wasn’t the INFINOX registered in the UK, but another entity he believed operated as part of the same company. After working with them for just under four months, in October 2019 he stopped getting payments and eventually terminated his involvement, even though he retained some access to the communication channels used by investors.

As a final note, Gurvin Singh (Mr. Gurvz) made sure to clear up that he didn’t handle any money. He wrote that “all clients signed Limited Powers of Attorney provided by INFINOX, which clearly outlined who was trading on their behalf and handling their accounts,” implying that it wasn’t him.

While there’s still much left unclear about the whole situation, Singh’s account gives a couple of valuable takeaways and only adds to the cautionary tale of risks, rewards, and shady deals. While he stopped short of recounting how the situation affected his life, it’s within reason to believe that, much like the people who invested the money, Gurvin would prefer if none of this ever happened.

Rosario is from New York and has worked with leading companies like Microsoft as a copy-writer in the past. Now he spends his time writing for readers of

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


VPNRanks Report Uncovers User Discontent with Majority of VPN Services




A groundbreaking report by VPNRanks reveals significant user dissatisfaction with the majority of VPN services, showing that 89% of VPNs globally fail to meet user satisfaction standards. This revelation comes at a critical time when digital security is paramount, and the demand for reliable VPN services continues to rise.

The Importance of User Satisfaction in the VPN industry

According to industry statistics from Global Market Insights, the global VPN market size was valued at USD 45 billion in 2022 and is estimated to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 20% from 2023 to 2032. Driven by the growing instances of cybercrimes and data thefts, coupled with the increasing proliferation of wireless devices and digital infrastructures across industries, user satisfaction remains a critical challenge for many providers. High user satisfaction is essential for customer retention, brand reputation, and long-term success in the competitive VPN market.

“User satisfaction is the cornerstone of success in the VPN industry. In a market flooded with options, it’s the real user experiences that set the leading providers apart. VPNScore helps users navigate this complex landscape by highlighting services that excel in meeting user expectations,” said Muhammad Saleem Ahrar, COO of webAffinity, the team behind VPNRanks.

VPNRanks is a leading VPN review platform that leverages sentiment analysis to provide comprehensive and unbiased reviews of VPN services. Its VPNScore is based on an AI-driven analysis of publicly available user reviews. The platform aims to simplify the process of identifying the best VPN provider tailored to each user’s unique needs.

VPNRanks Untangles Complex Findings on Key Features

VPNRanks evaluated four key features — ease of use, ease of setup, ability to meet user requirements, and quality of support — to identify the VPN companies that excel at customer satisfaction. To determine a final rank for each metric, VPNRanks combined a popularity score, which contributed 20 percent of the total, with a satisfaction score, which contributed 80 percent.

The study sifted through reviews on 93 paid VPN companies to determine the top providers. The VPNRanks report, issued in June 2024, provides rankings for each key feature and overall customer satisfaction. ExpressVPN achieved the top VPNScore — 6.29 out of 10 — for overall satisfaction globally. The next four top companies in that category, listed in descending order, are PureVPN, NordVPN, PrivateVPN, and Surfshark.

By assessing a variety of categories, the VPNRanks study reveals the challenges users face when trying to identify the best option to meet their needs. For example, NordVPN received a nearly perfect popularity score of 9.46 out of 10 but only a 4.7 satisfaction score. PrivateVPN received a satisfaction score of 6.69 out of 10, which rivaled ExpressVPN’s score in that category, but received a popularity score of only 1.23 out of 10.

The global rankings for ease of use illustrate how challenging identifying a quality provider can be. VeePN received a very high satisfaction score of 7.18 out of 10 while receiving a popularity score of less than 1 out of 10. The findings reveal a gap between user experience and market penetration that can effectively keep the best option hidden from the consumer.

The VPNRanks report gives users insight into satisfaction and popularity while providing a balanced assessment via its VPNScore. “Users should choose based on their priorities, whether it’s user satisfaction, market presence, or a balanced option,” the report states.

VPNRanks Shows Providers How to Become More Competitive

In addition to serving as a guide for consumers, VPNRanks also maps out a pathway for VPN providers seeking greater market share. The VPN providers that consistently appear in the top spots on the VPNRanks charts are those that have achieved a balance between popularity and user satisfaction. Those who neglect one or the other cannot keep pace with market leaders.

The report explains that those with high satisfaction scores but low popularity “might be well-loved by their users but need to increase their market visibility to compete more effectively.” Achieving overall success in the VPN market requires balancing user satisfaction with market presence, it advises.


As the need for VPN services continues to grow, businesses can expect to see more providers enter the market, making the task of identifying the best option more difficult. The insights VPNRanks provides stand as a timely beacon, guiding users to providers who can satisfy their needs and support their operations.

Continue Reading