Connect with us

World

Suffered An Animal Attack? Learn Why Hiring An Attorney Is Important!

mm

Published

on

If you watch a lot of television and commercials, you may be thinking that a personal injury attorney los angeles is only helpful when you get in a car or truck accident. However, that is completely false. A personal injury attorney can handle a myriad of causes, including animal attacks. 

Animal attacks can be dangerous. From giving permanent injuries to traumatizing a person for life, there is nothing that makes animal attacks less dangerous than a car accident. If you have suffered from a dog bite, you should not hesitate to contact an attorney.

Reasons to hire an attorney when attacked by an animal

 

  • The financial consequences of the attack can be devastating. 

 

The financial consequences of an animal bite or attack are no less than a car or truck wreck. Medical costs in Los Angeles are expensive, and you should not have to bear the costs when another party is at fault. The things you may need to pay for include: 

  • Emergency room visit
  • Antibiotics or other prescription drugs
  • Physical therapy
  • Medical devices such as crutches
  • Transportation by ambulance
  • X-rays or other diagnostic imaging tests
  • Blood tests
  • Outpatient physician services

All these can cost you a hundred thousand dollars or more. Having an attorney by your side can ensure that you will get some, most, or entire medical damages from the other party. 

 

  • Attorneys have legal knowledge about the laws concerning animal bites. 

 

An attorney with experience, knowledge, and years of training in handling animal bite cases can increase your chances of winning. They understand how complex filing a lawsuit and its procedure can be and can make the process easier for you. They can do most of the legal work while you focus on your recovery. They can also thoroughly explain everything you need to know about dog bite claims. 

 

  • Attorneys can negotiate on your behalf. 

 

Attorneys possess good negotiation skills. The defendant party will try their best to pay you as little as possible. They do not care about your injury as your attorney would. However, you must not accept a settlement less than what you deserve. Animal bites can lead to devastating physical and mental injuries and should be compensated properly. An attorney can make sure you get the right amount so you can manage your damages. 

 

  • They understand your legal rights. 

 

The best part about hiring an attorney is that they understand the law, which means they understand your rights as well. The average person does not fully know their rights as a victim in a dog bite claim, which may put them at a disadvantage. An attorney can protect you from making wrong choices and being fooled by another party. 

Jenny is one of the oldest contributors of Bigtime Daily with a unique perspective of the world events. She aims to empower the readers with delivery of apt factual analysis of various news pieces from around the World.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World

TRG Chairman Khaishgi and CEO Aslam implicated in $150 million fraud

mm

Published

on

In a scathing 52-page decision, the Sindh High Court has found that TRG Pakistan’s management was acting fraudulently and that Bermuda-based Greentree Holdings historic and prospective purchase of TRG shares were illegal, fraudulent and oppressive. 

The Sindh High Court has further directed TRGP to immediately hold board elections that have been overdue and illegally withheld by the existing board since January 14, 2025. 

In the landmark ruling, the Sindh High Court has blocked the attempted takeover of TRG Pakistan Limited by Greentree Holdings, declaring that the shares acquired by Greentree, nearly 30% of TRG’s stock, were unlawfully financed using TRG’s funds in violation of Section 86(2) of the Companies Act 2017.

“Having concluded that the affairs of TRGP are being conducted in an unlawful and fraudulent manner and in a manner oppressive to members such as the Petitioner (Zia Chishti), the case falls for corrective orders under sub-section (2) of section 286 of the Companies Act,” Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry concluded.

The case was brought by TRGP former CEO and founder Pakistani-American technology entrepreneur Zia Chishti against TRG Pakistan, its associate TRG International and TRG International’s wholly-owned shell company Greentree Limited.  In addition, the case named AKD Securities for managing Greentree’s illegal tender offer as well as various regulators requiring that they act to perform their regulatory duties.

The case centred around the dispute that shell company Greentree Limited was fraudulently using TRG Pakistan’s own funds to purchase TRG Pakistan’s shares in order to give control to Zia Chishti’s former partners Mohammed Khaishgi, Hasnain Aslam and Pinebridge Investments.

According to the case facts, the Chairman of TRG Pakistan Mohammed Khaishgi and the CEO of TRG Pakistan Hasnain Aslam masterminded the $150 million fraud. They did so together with Hong Kong based fund manager Pinebridge who has two nominees on TRG Pakistan’s board, Mr. John Leone and Mr. Patrick McGinnis.

According to the court papers, Khaishgi, Aslam, Leone, and McGinnis set up a shell company called Greentree which they secretly controlled and from which they started buying up shares of TRG Pakistan.  The fraud was that Greentree was using TRG Pakistan’s funds itself.  The idea was to give Khaishgi, Aslam, Leone, and McGinnis control over TRG Pakistan even though they owned less than 1% of the company, lawyers of the petitioner told the court. 

This was all part of a broader battle for control over TRG Pakistan that is raging between Khaishgi, Aslam, Leone, and McGinnis on one side and TRG Pakistan founder Zia Chishti on the other side.  Zia Chishti has been trying to retake control of TRG Pakistan after he was forced to resign in 2021 based on sexual misconduct allegations made by a former employee of his.  This year those allegations were shown to be without basis in litigation that Chishti launched in the United Kingdom against The Telegraph newspaper which had printed the allegations.  The Telegraph was forced to apologize for 13 separate articles it published about Chishti and paid him damages and legal costs.

After Chishti resigned in 2021, Khaishgi, Aslam, Leone, and McGinnis moved to take total control over TRG Pakistan and its various subsidiaries including TRG International and to block out Chishti.  The Sindh High Court’s ruling today has reversed that effort, ruling the scheme fraudulent, illegal, and oppressive.  

It now appears that Zia Chishti will take control of TRG Pakistan in short order when elections are called.  He and his family are now the largest shareholders with over 30% interest.  He is closely followed by companies related to Jahangir Siddiqui & Company which have over a 20% interest.  The result appears to be a complete vindication for Zia Chishti and damning for his rivals Aslam, Khaishgi, Leone, and McGinnis who have been ruled to have been conducting a fraud.  

TRG Pakistan’s share price declined by over 8% on the news on heavy volume.  Market experts say that this was because the tender offer at Rs 75 was gone and that now shares would trade closer to their natural value.  Presently the shares are trading at Rs 59 per share.

According to the court ruling, since 2021, shell company Greentree had purchased approximately 30% of TRG shares using $80 million of TRG’s own money, which means that that the directors of TRG Pakistan allowed company assets to be funneled through offshore affiliates TRG International and Greentree for acquiring TRG’s shares – a move deemed both fraudulent and oppressive to minority shareholders.  The Sindh High Court also found illegal Greentree’s further attempt to purchase another 35% of TRG shares using another $70 million of TRG’s money in a tender offer. 

The ruling is a major victory for the tech entrepreneur Zia Chishti against his former partners and the legal ruling paves the way for him to take control of TRG in a few weeks.

Continue Reading

Trending