Connect with us

Business

5 DeFi Projects That Seemed Promising But Went Under … 

mm

Published

on

With over 20,000 cryptocurrencies existing in the world today, there are countless projects out there that don’t survive long-term. These crypto projects are commonly referred to as “dead coins,” which simply refers to coins that no longer have any momentum.

The reason is not necessarily what the media likes to focus on : rug pull, exit scam etc. 

Reality is more complex and here are a few reasons why a project dies, but the most common are:

  • Not enough funds – there have been crypto projects out there that seemed promising and were created with all the right intentions, but they ended up not being able to raise the capital needed to follow through. In fact, most projects have this problem. Investors take note of the profit margins to see if they’re up to par. If not, they look right over these projects. 
  • Community Disengagement – with so many projects emerging in DeFi, it can be difficult to get the interest of enough people to reach escape velocity. Once a project has it, it has to keep it through the storm of other shiny objects competing for its investors’ attention. Sometimes the community gradually slips away, enticed by the promises of the next great thing.
  • Low trading volumes – If a project ends up with less than $1,000 in trading volume for three straight months, it’s considered a dead coin. Low trading volumes generally mean that a project falls short of providing utility and/or interest from traders. It’s a sure-fire path to the dead coin vault. 

Let’s look at a few of the top projects that seemed promising in the beginning but ultimately fell apart for one reason or another. 

1. NanoHealthcare Token (NHCT) 

The NanoHealthcare Token was created in India in an effort to reform the country’s healthcare system through the blockchain. The NHCT creators hoped to improve flaws in the system, reduce high costs and improve data security practices. 

NHCT aimed to take a holistic approach to healthcare and improve it through the concept of “total health.” This involved them focusing on four major parameters – mental, physical, fitness and a well-balanced diet. 

The coin experienced some hype but ultimately failed due to lack of investor interest. In turn, its developers abandoned the project. 

2. Paycoin (PCI)

Paycoin was among the first crypto projects out there. Launched in 2014 by respectable miners Josh Garza and GAW, Paycoin was intended to improve the Bitcoin network. The founders were well versed in the DeFi world. Paycoin saw massive growth in the beginning. With a market capitalization of $115 million in 48 hours, it quickly gained popularity.

Ultimately, the project fell apart due to a lack of security that stemmed from rushing production efforts. The founders were unable to fulfill many of their promises, which led to the downward spiral of Paycoin.  

3. SpaceBIT 

SpaceBIT was on a mission to be known for its uniqueness. The project involved launching nanosatellites into space that made electronic currencies accessible everywhere. The SpaceBIT team hyped up the world and made it seem as if they had all the materials needed for the successful completion of the project. Ultimately, though, they never followed through. Lack of infrastructure was the primary factor that caused SpaceBIT to fall out of the sky.

4. Ring Financial 

Ring Financial aimed to aggregate DeFi protocols, and it was intended to live on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC) to keep fees low for users. The project began with a 5.56% return per day offered in tokens. From November 4, 2021, to November 23, 2021, the project saw promising growth; it went from $1 to $250 in the short timeframe. 

Then came the first strike in December. After the project was verified on BSCScan, it became more visible than ever. This left it more vulnerable to hackers, which is what led to Ring’s contract being exploited in December of 2021. The project survived this hit but faced harsh scrutiny from investors. Ultimately, people began losing confidence in the project despite the teams’ efforts to save it. The project did not recover after this. 

5. GetGems (GEMZ) 

GetGems was launched in 2015 following a similar-named project (that ultimately failed) named Gems. The founder was Daniel Peled, and his vision was to change the social media world as we know it. 

GetGems was created as a social messaging app that allowed users to send and receive bitcoin. The project managed to raise $1 million initially through crowdfunding efforts along with direct investments. 

The project ultimately failed after it did not follow through on promises to change the social media landscape.

Do you have a dead coin in your portfolio? 

With the dawn of the crypto winter, it’s a possibility that you could have a dead coin floating around in your portfolio. Fortunately, there are some things to look out for when determining if a coin is legitimate or not. 

First, put a mental red flag up if you see a coin that guarantees a return on investment. Avoid these at all costs. Also, coins that are worth investing in will generally be listed on a trusted trading platform, such as Binance or Coinbase. 

Always remember to stay informed and make diligent decisions about your investments.

The idea of Bigtime Daily landed this engineer cum journalist from a multi-national company to the digital avenue. Matthew brought life to this idea and rendered all that was necessary to create an interactive and attractive platform for the readers. Apart from managing the platform, he also contributes his expertise in business niche.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

What to Look for in an Enterprise Webcasting Solution

mm

Published

on

The modern workplace doesn’t stand still. Teams are global, employees are remote, and companies must communicate faster and at scale. That’s why enterprise webcasting has gone from a niche tool to an essential part of internal communication strategies.

Reliability is the starting point when broadcasting to hundreds or thousands of employees, stakeholders, or partners. The platform you choose needs to deliver more than a stable video feed; it must offer security, accessibility, scalability, and real engagement.

For enterprises navigating this decision, here’s what to consider before committing to a webcasting platform.

Scale and Performance Matter More Than You Think

It’s one thing to host a video call with your immediate team. It’s another to run a high-stakes webcast for your entire global workforce. Enterprise webcasting means reaching large, often geographically dispersed audiences, sometimes tens of thousands of people at once. And when that’s the case, performance isn’t negotiable.

Your platform should offer proven scalability with minimal lag, buffering, or outage risk. Many organizations underestimate the bandwidth and technical infrastructure needed to deliver seamless webcasting at scale. Look for solutions that utilize global content delivery networks (CDNs) and redundant systems to guarantee smooth streaming, regardless of your viewers’ location.

The reality is, your message only lands if the technology holds up under pressure.

Security Isn’t Optional

In a world of growing cyber risks and data privacy concerns, security must be front and center, especially for enterprise webcasts. Not every message is meant for public ears, from internal town halls to sensitive investor briefings.

Leading webcasting platforms provide enterprise-grade security features like encrypted streams, password protection, login authentication, and customizable access controls. Depending on your industry, you may also need to meet specific regulatory requirements for data protection and compliance.

Ultimately, your webcasting solution should provide peace of mind, knowing that confidential information stays where it belongs.

User Experience Makes or Breaks Engagement

Let’s face it: no one wants to wrestle with clunky software minutes before a big company update. The best webcasting platforms make life easy for both presenters and attendees.

Intuitive interfaces and simplified workflows reduce stress and help presenters focus on delivering the message. The process should be frictionless for attendees, with one-click access, mobile compatibility, and no need for complicated installations.

But accessibility isn’t just technical, it’s also about inclusivity. Your platform should offer features like captions, translations, or on-demand playback options to ensure your workforce can engage with the content.

Because if people can’t easily join or follow along, your webcast risks becoming background noise.

Engagement is More Than Just Showing Up

In enterprise settings, communication can’t be one-way. True engagement requires interaction.

Modern webcasting solutions offer features like real-time Q&A, live polls, and chat functions to turn passive viewers into active participants. These elements keep audiences focused and create opportunities for meaningful feedback.

Especially for company-wide meetings or virtual events covering important updates, giving employees a voice makes the experience feel collaborative, not just another broadcast.

Data and Insights Drive Improvement

One of the most overlooked aspects of enterprise webcasting is analytics. But without data, it’s impossible to measure success or spot opportunities for improvement.

Look for platforms that provide detailed reporting, including attendance metrics, engagement rates, audience locations, and performance benchmarks. Over time, these insights help refine your communication strategy, adjusting formats, reworking content, or targeting specific groups with follow-up resources.

The more visibility you have into how people interact with your webcasts, the better equipped you are to make those events impactful.

Flexibility for Different Event Types

Not all webcasts are created equal. Some are formal, high-production events with large audiences. Others are more casual, interactive sessions for smaller groups.

The platform you choose should give you the flexibility to manage both scenarios. Whether you’re hosting a polished executive briefing, a technical product demonstration, or a virtual town hall, the tools should scale to fit your needs, without requiring entirely different systems or workflows.

Many providers also offer managed services for high-profile events, giving you access to technical experts who handle the backend so your team can focus on the message.

Final Thoughts

Webcasting has become a critical tool for modern businesses, but choosing the right platform requires more than just comparing price tags. It’s about finding a solution that delivers reliability, security, engagement, and scalability while making the process simple for both your team and your audience.

With enterprise webcasting, companies can ensure their most important messages are delivered securely and at scale, whether to employees down the hall or stakeholders around the globe.

Continue Reading

Trending