Business

Kamil Sattar Levels the Playing Field

Published

6 years ago

September 12, 2020

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused rippling shifts in the global economy. With constant disruptions in international supply and demand, the retail industry has been hit particularly hard. Large retail companies have had to take drastic measures, pulling from their deep pockets to mitigate the damage. Many smaller firms, without the necessary emergency reserves, have had no choice but to exit the market entirely.

While disruptions have hit all aspects of the retail industry, the impact has been largely asymmetric. Online stores are faring significantly better than their brick-and-mortar counterparts. Despite pandemic-borne challenges, such as supply chain issues and changes in regulations and customer habits, e-commerce firms have proved to be inherently more able to adapt due to their independence from a physical staff and concrete locations. In addition, community quarantine and social distancing measures have brought much of the typical retail activity online. As a result, the pandemic has served to demonstrate the capabilities of e-commerce as well as catalyze its growth into an increasingly significant aspect of the retail industry.

Among the various business models available, drop-shipping is one that fully demonstrates and capitalizes on the potential advantages of e-commerce. Drop-shipping allows a retailer to do business without physical contact with customers or suppliers. Instead, a drop-shipper serves to connect interested customers with the relevant manufacturers or wholesalers. In this manner, drop-shippers serve to take on both retailing and marketing functions. Through this added value, drop-shippers are able to negotiate profit margins depending on their proficiency in moving a supplier’s products. Drop-shipping is also unique in that it has very few barriers to entry, with little need to hold physical stock. These advantages have led to a continuing surge in the drop-shipping industry despite the challenges of the pandemic.

British entrepreneur Kamil Sattar is proof of the potential to be found in drop-shipping. When Kamil was only twenty years old, his companies were already earning a combined revenue of $3,000,000 a year. Aside from his staggering personal financial success, Kamil has also mentored aspiring entrepreneurs in drop-shipping, many of whom have moved on to create their own stores amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars. In the face of these achievements, Kamil wants the latter–helping others achieve their entrepreneurial goals through dropshipping–to be his lasting legacy.

Kamil himself lives in a sort of Spartan austerity, with little taste for personal luxury. Kamil’s primary motivation was and continues to be his family. Seeing his poor immigrant parents struggle financially gave Kamil the spark to do more and to provide for his family a secure and consistent stream of income. Despite his success, Kamil maintains his humble aspirations, aiming primarily to secure a future for himself, his parents, and his future family. Kamil aims to secure his financial future to be able to retire by age 40, dedicating the rest of his time to quality moments with his family.

Kamil’s rough upbringing and the struggles of his parents were the main drivers toward achieving his dreams of financial success. These also drove his desire to in turn help others in achieving a similar level of accomplishment. Kamil wants aspiring entrepreneurs to be offered the same opportunities that helped him reach where he is today. Those with the right entrepreneurial mindset, Kamil believes, would be able to take advantage of these opportunities and reach their own goals.

To achieve his dreams of granting equal opportunity to aspiring businessmen, Kamil offers himself for seminars, interviews, and public speaking events on top of his mentoring business. During the pandemic, Kamil also documented his extensive knowledge in drop-shipping to create mentoring courses, which he released free of charge. Kamil aims to create and release more of these courses annually in order to help those who cannot afford paid courses.

If you want to learn more about Kamil’s story, you can follow him on his Instagram, @kamilsattarofficial. Kamil may be booked for mentorships, seminars, interviews, and public speaking events on his website at kamilsattar.com.

Business

Click for Counsel: YesLawyer Wants to Make Lawyers as Accessible as Wi-Fi

Published

1 day ago

April 1, 2026

Matthew Wiles

Photo Courtesy of: YesLawyer

Byline: Andi Stark

For many people facing a legal problem, the most difficult part is not understanding their rights but finding a lawyer willing to speak with them in the first place. Long wait times, unclear pricing, and administrative hurdles often delay even the most basic consultations. YesLawyer, an AI-enabled plaintiff firm operating across all 50 states, is testing whether technology can shorten that gap.

Founded in 2024 by 25-year-old entrepreneur Rob Epstein, the platform offers free intake, automated screening, and, in many cases, same-day conversations with licensed attorneys. The idea is simple: reduce the friction between a client’s first request for help and an actual legal discussion. In this interview, Epstein explains how the system works, where artificial intelligence fits into the process, and what problems the company is trying to address in the broader legal system

Q: When you say you want lawyers to be “as accessible as Wi-Fi,” what does that mean in practical terms?

A: It’s a way of describing speed and availability. Someone dealing with a workplace dispute, a serious injury, or an immigration issue should be able to move from an online form or phone call to a real conversation with counsel in hours, not weeks. YesLawyer is structured so that a client begins with a free case evaluation, goes through automated conflict checks and basic screening, and, in many instances, speaks with a lawyer the same day.

Q: How does the process work once someone contacts the platform?

A: We use a structured workflow. It starts with a short questionnaire and an initial conversation to capture basic facts. That information feeds into conflict checks and internal review. The system then proposes a match with a licensed attorney and provides a calendar link for a virtual consultation, often within 24 hours. After the meeting, the client receives a written legal plan outlining next steps, deadlines, and estimated fees.

Q: Where does artificial intelligence fit into that process, and where does it stop?

A: AI is used for organizing and routing information, not for giving legal advice. It helps with conflict checks at scale, case categorization, and structured summaries so attorneys can focus on the substance of the matter. Every consultation is conducted by a licensed lawyer, and all decisions about strategy or next steps are made by humans.

Q: What problem is this model trying to solve in the current legal system?

A: Delay and cost are still major barriers. Many civil plaintiffs face long waits just to get a first appointment, along with high retainers and hourly billing that make early legal advice risky. We try to respond with faster consultations, flat-fee options, and financing. The idea is to remove administrative friction so lawyers spend less time on logistics and more time speaking with clients.

Q: Some critics say platforms like this blur the line between a technology company and a law firm. How do you describe YesLawyer?

A: We describe ourselves as a national, AI-enabled plaintiff firm that connects clients with independent attorneys. That structure does raise regulatory questions, especially around responsibility and oversight. We focus on licensing verification, attorney-written case plans, and clear communication about fees and services.

Q: You’ve said the main bottleneck is “systems” rather than people. What do you mean by that?

A: The issue isn’t that lawyers don’t want to help more people. It’s that the systems around them make it hard to scale their time. Intake, scheduling, and document handling take hours. Automating those parts means attorneys can handle more matters without being overwhelmed by repetitive tasks.

Q: Does this model risk favoring only the most profitable cases?

A: That’s a real concern in legal technology. Automation often works best for repeatable, high-volume disputes. Our view is that lowering administrative cost can actually make it easier to take on smaller or more complex cases that might otherwise be turned away. Whether that holds over time depends on the data.

Measuring Impact Over Time

YesLawyer’s attempt to compress the timeline between inquiry and consultation reflects broader changes in how legal services are being delivered. As artificial intelligence becomes more common in administrative work, firms are experimenting with new ways to reduce wait times and clarify costs.

The company’s early growth suggests that many clients value faster access to an initial conversation, even before considering long-term representation. Whether this platform-based model becomes widely adopted or remains one of several emerging approaches will depend on regulatory developments, lawyer participation, and measurable outcomes for clients. For now, YesLawyer’s experiment highlights a central question in modern legal practice: how quickly can help realistically be made available to the people who need it.