Connect with us

World

Can I Sue for a Dog Bite in Milwaukee, Wisconsin

mm

Published

on

Astonishingly in the United States, approximately 4.7 million people are bitten by dogs each year. Statistically, this means you have a 1 in 70 chance of being bitten by a dog annually. Dog bites can leave a person suffering from excruciatingly painful injuries that could take months or years of rehabilitation. 

If you or a family member is bitten by a dog, you have the right to sue for a dog bite injury in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. An experienced dog bite attorney can help you initiate a claim and act in your best interest every step of the way. Dog bite injuries are often incredibly traumatizing experiences and can leave you with financial difficulties. An attorney can work with you to gain you the compensation you need to put this horrific event behind you. 

The Common Dog Bite Injuries

It is crucial to understand dog bite injuries can range from minor to severe. In some cases, you could still sue for a dog bite injury if you were injured while trying to flee an animal, even if you were never bitten. Below are a few common injuries that follow a dog attack or bite. 

  • Various puncture wounds
  • Minor to severe scarring or disfigurement
  • Broken bones
  • Head and neck injuries from struggling or falling
  • Emotional trauma
  • Face injuries
  • Rabies
  • Nerve damage

Who Is Allowed to Sue for a Dog Bite in Milwaukee, Wisconsin?

If you or a family member has been attacked by a dog and have suffered injuries, you are likely wondering if you’re eligible for compensation. Below we have listed a few insights into who can sue.

  • Should you be the legal guardian of an adult who was injured by a dog bite: If you are a legal guardian of an adult, you are allowed to initiate a lawsuit and seek fair compensation on behalf of the injured person. 
  • You were bitten by a dog and are 18 or older. You are legally an adult and are allowed to seek compensation for your injuries. 
  • Should you be the legal guardian or parent of a minor who was bitten by a dog and injured: Children who have been injured due to a dog bite require their parents or legal guardians to undertake legal proceedings on their behalf. As a parent or guardian, you expressly have the right to act in the best interest of your child, which is why you can file a lawsuit on their behalf and seek out compensation. 
  • You are the designated administrator or executor of the injured person’s estate. If you are the assigned administrator or executor of the estate of the person who has suffered injuries and died due to a dog bite, you are allowed to file a wrongful death lawsuit.

How the Wisconsin Statute of Limitations Can Affect Your Dog Bite Injury Claim

The victim can be unable to work, has incurred major medical bills, or requires further funding for treatment which are all time sensitive and the insurers know this. In return, a common tactic for insurance companies to reduce the amounts of settlements paid is to take as much time as legally possible before being forced to pay. This way they can often get the victims to agree to a reduced settlement when time is more important than the overall compensation. 

In Milwaukee, Wisconsin, you have three years from the date of the dog bite injury to file your claim. 

Notably, if you do not file a legal claim within the three-year timeline, you will be barred from pursuing compensation. You don’t want to place yourself in this position. 

Understanding the legalities surrounding dog bite law in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, can be challenging. It should come as a significant relief to learn you likely can sue for a dog bite injury if you fall within the criteria. By keeping in mind the timeframe for which you are permitted to file an injury claim and noting the disreputable tactics insurance companies employ, you will have a better chance of obtaining compensation. Additionally, with the help of a qualified dog bite attorney, you can maximize your settlement.

Jenny is one of the oldest contributors of Bigtime Daily with a unique perspective of the world events. She aims to empower the readers with delivery of apt factual analysis of various news pieces from around the World.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World

Criminal probe focussed on Mehtas shipping business

mm

Published

on

From Monitoring Desk

DUBAI: An Asian family linked with the shipping business is facing criminal investigation in several jurisdictions including in Dubai and Far East where the family’s companies are under active investigation now, according to the authorities in three countries.

Sanjay and Gaurav Mehta, through their companies Best Oasis Ltd in Dubai and Priya Blue Industries in Gujarat, are facing investigations over money-laundering suspicions and suspected links to the Russian oil sector, sanctioned by the western countries, sources shared.

Sanjay and Gaurav Mehta, through their companies Best Oasis Ltd in Dubai and Priya Blue Industries in Gujarat have projected an image of environmental responsibility in ship recycling. They have tout certifications, attend global summits, and positioned themselves as ESG-compliant but their business practices have come under intense probe now. Their operations reportedly involve dismantling high-risk ships, using cash transactions, and leveraging political connections to avoid accountability, a source shared looking into the companies’ affairs. The investigation is being conducted in Dubai and the Far East.

The investigators are looking at the Mehtas operations dating back to 2006 when they came to attention of the law enforcement for the first time. Priya Blue dismantled the “Blue Lady” in 2006, a vessel containing over 1,200 tons of asbestos and radioactive waste, despite protests and objections from Greenpeace. Later, the “Exxon Valdez,” notorious for a major oil spill, was renamed “Oriental Nicety” and dismantled by the Mehtas in Gujarat, drawing international attention. In recent years, their transactions have become less conspicuous but reportedly more hazardous.

In 2025, Best Oasis allegedly acquired and dismantled at least four vessels linked to sanctioned entities, including Iranian and Houthi-controlled networks. These weren’t obscure ships; they were designated under U.S. terrorism sanctions for their involvement in oil smuggling and arms transport. According to investigators, here are the details of the sanctioned ships dismantled by Best Oasis in 2025: IMO: 9155808, Name: NOLAN (SOLAN), Sanction: SDN (SDGT), Beaching: 31 Jan 2025, Plot 16; IMO: 9221657, Name: BLUEFINS, Sanction: SDN (SDGT); Beaching: 26 Feb 2025, Plot 16; IMO: 9105085, Name: CONTRACT II, Sanction: SDN risk, Beaching: Arrived mid-2025, Plot 27; IMO: 9209300, Name: GAMA II, Sanction: SDN (SDGT); and Beaching: Pending/Planned, Plot 34

All four vessels were reportedly dismantled in Alang on plots leased by proxy firms connected to the Mehtas. These short-term leases, approved on a ship-by-ship basis by the Gujarat Maritime Board, reportedly make regulatory oversight nearly impossible. Once dismantling is complete, plot registrations often lapse, leaving no long-term record, according to documents shared by the investigators in Dubai.

Rahul Mistry, a shipping compliance researcher, noted this as a growing pattern: “This is a pattern we’ve seen more frequently in the last two years   sanctioned hulls arriving under the radar, processed fast, with no digital trace.”

Payments for these vessels reportedly bypassed normal financial channels. According to sources familiar with the deals, transactions were settled in cash, either on-site or through offshore handlers. One source described entire ship values being paid in foreign currency bundles, avoiding Indian and Dubai banking disclosures, said one of the investigators familiar with the matter.

A retired port official Mr. Akin Yadav, familiar with Alang  and Gujarat Maritime Board approvals stated that short-term leases are routinely used to avoid scrutiny, adding, “It was never meant to be a permanent workaround. But it’s become one.”

Political connections also reportedly play a role. Union Minister Mansukh Mandaviya and Gujarat State Minister Jitu Vaghani have been linked to approvals granted for Best Oasis and its proxies. While there’s no direct evidence of personal gain, sources allege that both men used their influence to expedite approvals, slow down inquiries, and shield the companies from enforcement.

Despite these activities in India, Best Oasis is expanding under new branding. A recent joint venture in Japan with Hiroshi Abe is being marketed as a clean, regionally responsible recycling partner for Japanese shipowners.

Mariko Fujita, a Tokyo-based maritime consultant, observed, “They’re presenting themselves as a new entity with no reference to past controversies. But none of the underlying ownership or structure has changed.”

In Alang, the situation reportedly remains much the same. Plot numbers are reassigned, cash continues to circulate and the same network of breakers and handlers is reportedly involved. Individuals like Jayant Vanani (also known as Budhabhai Patel) and Ramesh Mendapara are frequently named in connection with specific beachings, including “Contract II” and “GAMA II.” Both have been previously linked to other shadow transactions involving distressed or sanctioned tonnage.

Several yards allegedly connected to Best Oasis, including Shantamani Ship Breakers and Sai Baba Ship Breakers, reportedly operate with minimal inspection, despite numerous reports of irregularities in worker safety, hazardous waste disposal, and compliance with Indian scrapping codes.

This system, according to multiple sources, appears to be intentionally designed to operate in plain sight with just enough paperwork to pass basic scrutiny but not enough to trigger meaningful enforcement. There is no indication that regulatory bodies including customs, port health officers, or environmental oversight panels have conducted full inspections of any of the sanctioned vessels listed. Most were reportedly cleared and dismantled within days of arrival.

Rahul Mistry said: “This isn’t merely a loophole; it’s reportedly a business model. Best Oasis and Priya Blue are allegedly running a high-volume, low-visibility operation that filters sanctioned, end-of-life ships through legal instruments to appear legitimate on paper. This reportedly involves routing untaxed funds and shielded actors through a well-connected political and industrial network. As global scrutiny of ESG practices intensifies, many of these activities are allegedly being whitewashed through new partnerships and branding, but the underlying mechanisms reportedly remain unchanged.”

Continue Reading

Trending