Business

How Can You Include QR Codes Into Your Webcast Activities?

Published

4 years ago

January 3, 2022

Everything, including seminars and workshops, has gone online. However, unlike face-to-face encounters, online interactions have several constraints. And these detract many people from absorbing the whole experience.

So, how do you compensate for those flaws? What can you do to enhance the webinar experience?

QR codes are one option to consider. While it may not appear so, these squared codes open up a plethora of choices. It’s not a matter of whether you can use them, but instead of how.

There is wide array of options available, especially since there is a QR code generator online that they can use to simplify their webcast experience. Please continue reading to find out what they are. Get an idea and develop your plan for putting it into action.

1. Lecturers can use QR codes in their online engagement activities.

Participants in face-to-face webinars and workshops can interact with one another. It relieves dullness and gets everyone excited for the real deal. When done through the internet, however, this is not the case.

As a result, it is usual for attendees to sleep their way out of the event. However, you may introduce a new interaction by using QR codes to keep your audience captivated and attention.

You can make a game out of a QR code. You can use an editable QR code to control the type of material that pops up depending on how many times it has been scanned. What you can do is put a QR code on your display at random and have your participants race to see who can scan it beforehand.

2. Attendance Sheet with QR Code

The issue with webinars is that consumers can connect and then leave their gadgets turned on without paying attention to the event. What you can do is use a QR code to check the attendance of the attendees at random.

Show them the image to scan it and fill out a form. You can tell when they scanned a QR code using dynamic QR codes. This assures that everyone completed the form only when you flashed it and not at any other time.

This is useful if you are a lecturer. It is one method of ensuring that no student cheats their way into your session.

3. QR Code Immersive Realities

During a presentation, you must maintain a consistent tempo. While this allows you to complete your webinar, it also means that your audience will find it difficult to follow. They may even fall behind.

That is not what you desire. Your goal is to ensure that they fully comprehend the message and purpose of your discussion.

You can provide a solution to this quandary by using QR codes. Use a variety of graphics, each with reference to your webinar, so that your audience can examine your materials at their own leisure.

You can even make the entire debate more immersive by using a QR code generator with logo to create QR codes that include audio and movies.

4. Use QR Codes to Send Downloadable Documents

If you want to allow your participants to download content, such as extra references, it can be time-consuming for them to copy the URL link you’re about to display. Make it easier for them by converting your materials into QR codes using a PDF QR code.

By making it simple to access your documents, you ensure that your audience takes the time to read them. It also helps you to proceed with your discussion at a more consistent pace, rather than frequently stopping to pander to them.

Conclusion:

QR codes, as simple as they appear, bring new ideas to the table. It improves the interactivity, immersion, and conduciveness of your webinar.

Because QR codes bring new ideas to the table, having a successful webcast event is just a scan away, attracting more participants to learn more about your course.

Business

Click for Counsel: YesLawyer Wants to Make Lawyers as Accessible as Wi-Fi

Published

5 days ago

April 1, 2026

Matthew Wiles

Photo Courtesy of: YesLawyer

Byline: Andi Stark

For many people facing a legal problem, the most difficult part is not understanding their rights but finding a lawyer willing to speak with them in the first place. Long wait times, unclear pricing, and administrative hurdles often delay even the most basic consultations. YesLawyer, an AI-enabled plaintiff firm operating across all 50 states, is testing whether technology can shorten that gap.

Founded in 2024 by 25-year-old entrepreneur Rob Epstein, the platform offers free intake, automated screening, and, in many cases, same-day conversations with licensed attorneys. The idea is simple: reduce the friction between a client’s first request for help and an actual legal discussion. In this interview, Epstein explains how the system works, where artificial intelligence fits into the process, and what problems the company is trying to address in the broader legal system

Q: When you say you want lawyers to be “as accessible as Wi-Fi,” what does that mean in practical terms?

A: It’s a way of describing speed and availability. Someone dealing with a workplace dispute, a serious injury, or an immigration issue should be able to move from an online form or phone call to a real conversation with counsel in hours, not weeks. YesLawyer is structured so that a client begins with a free case evaluation, goes through automated conflict checks and basic screening, and, in many instances, speaks with a lawyer the same day.

Q: How does the process work once someone contacts the platform?

A: We use a structured workflow. It starts with a short questionnaire and an initial conversation to capture basic facts. That information feeds into conflict checks and internal review. The system then proposes a match with a licensed attorney and provides a calendar link for a virtual consultation, often within 24 hours. After the meeting, the client receives a written legal plan outlining next steps, deadlines, and estimated fees.

Q: Where does artificial intelligence fit into that process, and where does it stop?

A: AI is used for organizing and routing information, not for giving legal advice. It helps with conflict checks at scale, case categorization, and structured summaries so attorneys can focus on the substance of the matter. Every consultation is conducted by a licensed lawyer, and all decisions about strategy or next steps are made by humans.

Q: What problem is this model trying to solve in the current legal system?

A: Delay and cost are still major barriers. Many civil plaintiffs face long waits just to get a first appointment, along with high retainers and hourly billing that make early legal advice risky. We try to respond with faster consultations, flat-fee options, and financing. The idea is to remove administrative friction so lawyers spend less time on logistics and more time speaking with clients.

Q: Some critics say platforms like this blur the line between a technology company and a law firm. How do you describe YesLawyer?

A: We describe ourselves as a national, AI-enabled plaintiff firm that connects clients with independent attorneys. That structure does raise regulatory questions, especially around responsibility and oversight. We focus on licensing verification, attorney-written case plans, and clear communication about fees and services.

Q: You’ve said the main bottleneck is “systems” rather than people. What do you mean by that?

A: The issue isn’t that lawyers don’t want to help more people. It’s that the systems around them make it hard to scale their time. Intake, scheduling, and document handling take hours. Automating those parts means attorneys can handle more matters without being overwhelmed by repetitive tasks.

Q: Does this model risk favoring only the most profitable cases?

A: That’s a real concern in legal technology. Automation often works best for repeatable, high-volume disputes. Our view is that lowering administrative cost can actually make it easier to take on smaller or more complex cases that might otherwise be turned away. Whether that holds over time depends on the data.

Measuring Impact Over Time

YesLawyer’s attempt to compress the timeline between inquiry and consultation reflects broader changes in how legal services are being delivered. As artificial intelligence becomes more common in administrative work, firms are experimenting with new ways to reduce wait times and clarify costs.

The company’s early growth suggests that many clients value faster access to an initial conversation, even before considering long-term representation. Whether this platform-based model becomes widely adopted or remains one of several emerging approaches will depend on regulatory developments, lawyer participation, and measurable outcomes for clients. For now, YesLawyer’s experiment highlights a central question in modern legal practice: how quickly can help realistically be made available to the people who need it.