Connect with us

World

How to Get Compensation for a Distracted Driving Accident

mm

Published

on

According to data from the CDC, nine people are killed every day in the US in distracted driving accidents. Distracted Driving is defined as engaging in an activity that takes your attention away from driving, increasing the chances of a motor vehicle accident. 

Distracted driving comes in three forms: 

  • Visual- taking your eyes off the road
  • Manual- taking your hands off the wheel
  • Cognitive- taking your mind off of driving

Getting Compensation for a Distracted Driving Accident 

With this in mind, those you are involved in an accident caused by distracted driving, should take several measures to increase the chances of compensation. 

Document the Entire Accident

Documenting the accident is arguably the most important thing you should do when involved. If you are able to take pictures of the scene, take as many as possible. 

Additionally, write details of what transpired before and after the accident. This can help you and others document the accident properly.

Seek Immediate Medical Attention 

When involved in an accident, you should seek medical attention to help treat injuries and examine any complications that might arise later. Seeking medical attention will also help prove that you were injured in the accident. 

You should ensure that the entire medical process is documented to present these in court as evidence. Performing this process will significantly increase your chances of compensation. 

Request for a Police Report 

Some people make the mistake of failing to file a police report just because they were not injured during the accident. You should file a police report regardless of whether you were injured or not. 

Filing a police report documents the accident and helps prevent the distracted driver from committing the same felony again. Once you file the report, you should request it as evidence when claiming compensation. 

Hire a Reputable Lawyer 

Hiring a lawyer helps increase your chances of getting compensated after a distracted driving accident. 

For instance, a lawyer will help determine the liable party for the accident. While it may seem obvious that the driver was responsible, a victim may also be able to receive compensation from a car manufacturer, accident locality or other third party. A meticulous lawyer will go to great lengths to interview witnesses and find the liable party or parties. 

The Takeaway

“Victims of distracted driving accidents should speak with an attorney to examine their compensation avenues,” says Melissa Odama of Seattle Car Accident Law Firm. “With thorough legal assistance, distracted driving accident victims can better recover the damages they need to best move on from the incident.”

Distracted driving comes in many forms, meaning you and your attorney should explore all possible scenarios to find the root cause of the accident and the liable party. This may involve subpoenaing phone records to prove the driver was on a phone call. 

Cases of distracted driving are on the rise on US roads. If you get involved, you should know the next course of action to get compensated and ensure the driver does not make such a mistake again and put other motorists’ lives in danger. 

Jenny is one of the oldest contributors of Bigtime Daily with a unique perspective of the world events. She aims to empower the readers with delivery of apt factual analysis of various news pieces from around the World.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World

TRG Chairman Khaishgi and CEO Aslam implicated in $150 million fraud

mm

Published

on

In a scathing 52-page decision, the Sindh High Court has found that TRG Pakistan’s management was acting fraudulently and that Bermuda-based Greentree Holdings historic and prospective purchase of TRG shares were illegal, fraudulent and oppressive. 

The Sindh High Court has further directed TRGP to immediately hold board elections that have been overdue and illegally withheld by the existing board since January 14, 2025. 

In the landmark ruling, the Sindh High Court has blocked the attempted takeover of TRG Pakistan Limited by Greentree Holdings, declaring that the shares acquired by Greentree, nearly 30% of TRG’s stock, were unlawfully financed using TRG’s funds in violation of Section 86(2) of the Companies Act 2017.

“Having concluded that the affairs of TRGP are being conducted in an unlawful and fraudulent manner and in a manner oppressive to members such as the Petitioner (Zia Chishti), the case falls for corrective orders under sub-section (2) of section 286 of the Companies Act,” Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry concluded.

The case was brought by TRGP former CEO and founder Pakistani-American technology entrepreneur Zia Chishti against TRG Pakistan, its associate TRG International and TRG International’s wholly-owned shell company Greentree Limited.  In addition, the case named AKD Securities for managing Greentree’s illegal tender offer as well as various regulators requiring that they act to perform their regulatory duties.

The case centred around the dispute that shell company Greentree Limited was fraudulently using TRG Pakistan’s own funds to purchase TRG Pakistan’s shares in order to give control to Zia Chishti’s former partners Mohammed Khaishgi, Hasnain Aslam and Pinebridge Investments.

According to the case facts, the Chairman of TRG Pakistan Mohammed Khaishgi and the CEO of TRG Pakistan Hasnain Aslam masterminded the $150 million fraud. They did so together with Hong Kong based fund manager Pinebridge who has two nominees on TRG Pakistan’s board, Mr. John Leone and Mr. Patrick McGinnis.

According to the court papers, Khaishgi, Aslam, Leone, and McGinnis set up a shell company called Greentree which they secretly controlled and from which they started buying up shares of TRG Pakistan.  The fraud was that Greentree was using TRG Pakistan’s funds itself.  The idea was to give Khaishgi, Aslam, Leone, and McGinnis control over TRG Pakistan even though they owned less than 1% of the company, lawyers of the petitioner told the court. 

This was all part of a broader battle for control over TRG Pakistan that is raging between Khaishgi, Aslam, Leone, and McGinnis on one side and TRG Pakistan founder Zia Chishti on the other side.  Zia Chishti has been trying to retake control of TRG Pakistan after he was forced to resign in 2021 based on sexual misconduct allegations made by a former employee of his.  This year those allegations were shown to be without basis in litigation that Chishti launched in the United Kingdom against The Telegraph newspaper which had printed the allegations.  The Telegraph was forced to apologize for 13 separate articles it published about Chishti and paid him damages and legal costs.

After Chishti resigned in 2021, Khaishgi, Aslam, Leone, and McGinnis moved to take total control over TRG Pakistan and its various subsidiaries including TRG International and to block out Chishti.  The Sindh High Court’s ruling today has reversed that effort, ruling the scheme fraudulent, illegal, and oppressive.  

It now appears that Zia Chishti will take control of TRG Pakistan in short order when elections are called.  He and his family are now the largest shareholders with over 30% interest.  He is closely followed by companies related to Jahangir Siddiqui & Company which have over a 20% interest.  The result appears to be a complete vindication for Zia Chishti and damning for his rivals Aslam, Khaishgi, Leone, and McGinnis who have been ruled to have been conducting a fraud.  

TRG Pakistan’s share price declined by over 8% on the news on heavy volume.  Market experts say that this was because the tender offer at Rs 75 was gone and that now shares would trade closer to their natural value.  Presently the shares are trading at Rs 59 per share.

According to the court ruling, since 2021, shell company Greentree had purchased approximately 30% of TRG shares using $80 million of TRG’s own money, which means that that the directors of TRG Pakistan allowed company assets to be funneled through offshore affiliates TRG International and Greentree for acquiring TRG’s shares – a move deemed both fraudulent and oppressive to minority shareholders.  The Sindh High Court also found illegal Greentree’s further attempt to purchase another 35% of TRG shares using another $70 million of TRG’s money in a tender offer. 

The ruling is a major victory for the tech entrepreneur Zia Chishti against his former partners and the legal ruling paves the way for him to take control of TRG in a few weeks.

Continue Reading

Trending