Business

How video content steals the attention of a scroller?

Published

5 years ago

September 13, 2021

The social media and other platforms on the web are drenched in content that catches the spectator’s attention. Numerous content creators, marketing agencies, and brands toil hard to make their content trend and gain views. Although there is a plethora of content present on different browsers, only the unique and engaging content catches the attention of scrollers.

The recent epochal shift has digitized nearly everything. One form of content that is prevailing exceptionally in the contemporary world is videos. This recording, reproducing, and broadcasting of moving visual images steal the attention of net heads phenomenally. Following that, individuals are now used to covering thousands of kilometers on their smart screens with their thumbs by simply scrolling on different social platforms.

As a result, content is abundant. However, videos are a kind of content that stops an individual from scrolling further to view the engaging content shown in the video. The moving visuals lure individuals to keep on watching the video. If made right, videos can take information and make it easy to interpret in a short amount of time. It has been contemplated through research that a one-minute video is worth 1.8 million words.

The human brain can process visuals much quicker than it can text. About 90% of the total information transmitted to the brain is visual. Moreover, the brain can process these visuals 60,000 times faster than text. The human mind is not only more used to seeing visuals but is also better at interpreting them.

Videos are more engaging than texts and even images because they are of higher resolution. Higher resolutions mean more pixels per inch (PPI), resulting in more pixel information and creating a high-quality, crisp video. This grabs the attention of the viewer and forces them to spend time on videos.

Evident is the fact that brands and other agencies make out the most from video to increase their website traffic. They use this form of multimedia to execute constructive branding, which helps them spread their message of what products or services their brand offers. Companies that use videos on their websites have 41% more web traffic from searches than websites that do not use this innovation. Videos also drive organic traffic up by 157%. Further, one can gain this increased traffic by placing videos on their website’s landing pages. Embedding videos on landing pages can increase conversions by 80%.

Videos are an excellent form of media that has proved beneficial to both brands and content creators. However, the real challenge is to make top-quality videos to stand out in the concentrated social market. One platform which provides exceptional tools and strategies to make unique videos is InVideo. This Mumbai-based startup provides a freemium web-based editing tool that allows users to create videos that are fit to be published on popular social media platforms (such as Twitter, Facebook, YouTube). Since its launch at the end of 2017, it has gained more than a million users from 195 countries who have created more than 2 million videos in over 75 languages.

Founded by Sanket Shah (CEO) and Harsh Vakharia, InVideo has become the talk of the town in just four years due to its affordable rates and excellent services. With the launch of their mobile app, Filmr, they will now also make easy and quick video creation accessible to mobile users across the globe. This constructive platform uses high technology comprising premium pro features and stock footage which the user creates an outstanding video. InVideo is fostering in creating unique and engaging content through their compelling video-making platform.

“I have tried different cloud-based video creators, and no doubt this is the best I have used so far. Their templates are really good and they keep on adding new features and templates based on their users’ suggestions. I want to emphasize how powerful their video editor is that you can edit almost everything. The InVideo team, including the CEO, is very active on the live chat and on their Facebook group. They usually reply within just a few minutes to answer customer queries or problems. The kind of support that I received from the team is really top notch! they even send you personal emails just to let you know that the problem is solved.” Says Vinson, SEO Specialist

Business

Click for Counsel: YesLawyer Wants to Make Lawyers as Accessible as Wi-Fi

Published

1 day ago

April 1, 2026

Matthew Wiles

Photo Courtesy of: YesLawyer

Byline: Andi Stark

For many people facing a legal problem, the most difficult part is not understanding their rights but finding a lawyer willing to speak with them in the first place. Long wait times, unclear pricing, and administrative hurdles often delay even the most basic consultations. YesLawyer, an AI-enabled plaintiff firm operating across all 50 states, is testing whether technology can shorten that gap.

Founded in 2024 by 25-year-old entrepreneur Rob Epstein, the platform offers free intake, automated screening, and, in many cases, same-day conversations with licensed attorneys. The idea is simple: reduce the friction between a client’s first request for help and an actual legal discussion. In this interview, Epstein explains how the system works, where artificial intelligence fits into the process, and what problems the company is trying to address in the broader legal system

Q: When you say you want lawyers to be “as accessible as Wi-Fi,” what does that mean in practical terms?

A: It’s a way of describing speed and availability. Someone dealing with a workplace dispute, a serious injury, or an immigration issue should be able to move from an online form or phone call to a real conversation with counsel in hours, not weeks. YesLawyer is structured so that a client begins with a free case evaluation, goes through automated conflict checks and basic screening, and, in many instances, speaks with a lawyer the same day.

Q: How does the process work once someone contacts the platform?

A: We use a structured workflow. It starts with a short questionnaire and an initial conversation to capture basic facts. That information feeds into conflict checks and internal review. The system then proposes a match with a licensed attorney and provides a calendar link for a virtual consultation, often within 24 hours. After the meeting, the client receives a written legal plan outlining next steps, deadlines, and estimated fees.

Q: Where does artificial intelligence fit into that process, and where does it stop?

A: AI is used for organizing and routing information, not for giving legal advice. It helps with conflict checks at scale, case categorization, and structured summaries so attorneys can focus on the substance of the matter. Every consultation is conducted by a licensed lawyer, and all decisions about strategy or next steps are made by humans.

Q: What problem is this model trying to solve in the current legal system?

A: Delay and cost are still major barriers. Many civil plaintiffs face long waits just to get a first appointment, along with high retainers and hourly billing that make early legal advice risky. We try to respond with faster consultations, flat-fee options, and financing. The idea is to remove administrative friction so lawyers spend less time on logistics and more time speaking with clients.

Q: Some critics say platforms like this blur the line between a technology company and a law firm. How do you describe YesLawyer?

A: We describe ourselves as a national, AI-enabled plaintiff firm that connects clients with independent attorneys. That structure does raise regulatory questions, especially around responsibility and oversight. We focus on licensing verification, attorney-written case plans, and clear communication about fees and services.

Q: You’ve said the main bottleneck is “systems” rather than people. What do you mean by that?

A: The issue isn’t that lawyers don’t want to help more people. It’s that the systems around them make it hard to scale their time. Intake, scheduling, and document handling take hours. Automating those parts means attorneys can handle more matters without being overwhelmed by repetitive tasks.

Q: Does this model risk favoring only the most profitable cases?

A: That’s a real concern in legal technology. Automation often works best for repeatable, high-volume disputes. Our view is that lowering administrative cost can actually make it easier to take on smaller or more complex cases that might otherwise be turned away. Whether that holds over time depends on the data.

Measuring Impact Over Time

YesLawyer’s attempt to compress the timeline between inquiry and consultation reflects broader changes in how legal services are being delivered. As artificial intelligence becomes more common in administrative work, firms are experimenting with new ways to reduce wait times and clarify costs.

The company’s early growth suggests that many clients value faster access to an initial conversation, even before considering long-term representation. Whether this platform-based model becomes widely adopted or remains one of several emerging approaches will depend on regulatory developments, lawyer participation, and measurable outcomes for clients. For now, YesLawyer’s experiment highlights a central question in modern legal practice: how quickly can help realistically be made available to the people who need it.