Connect with us

World

Indiana’s Casinos start Sport betting, While Ohio is Considering to Legalize it

mm

Published

on

While the lawmakers in Ohia and Kentucky are still thinking about bringing the bills that legalize sports betting, a second Greater Cincinnati casino in Indiana has launched the sports betting services on November 11. Rising Sun Casino Resort is now offering sports betting options for gamblers. The casino will also allow betting on sports starting with an event featuring former Cincinnati Bengals Players.

Indiana has legalized sports betting on September 1 and now 10 casinos across the state are offering sports betting including Greater Cincinnati’s Hollywood Casino Lawrenceburg. All ten casinos took $35 million in sports betting in September and made an outcome of $8.6 million with $800,000 in taxes for the state.

That means sports betting has a good future in the state and a large number of casinos are including it in their business.

Indiana is the 13th state in the US that has legalized sports betting. In 2018 US Supreme Cout ruling allowed the states whether they want to run sports betting or not. Ohio lawmakers are brining two bills to make sports betting events legal in the casinos. The bills are facing resistance from the debate among lawmakers about who will regulate the sports betting industry and what kind of betting will be legal in the state.

The debate is including both the bills that are seeking the way to make sports betting legal in the state. House Bill 194 was introduced in April and it is co-sponsored by Cincinnati Democrat State Rep. Brigid Kelly and Westlake Republican State Rep will place control of sports betting under the Ohio Lottery Commission. They will also choose an investigation into the industry to the Ohio Casino Commission.

The second bill, Senate Bill 111 will give the casino commission full control to run the sports betting in the state. House Bill 194 will execute the return of a 10-percent tax on sports betting. The tax will be used for public education and the effort to fight gambling addiction.

The bills to make sports betting legal in the state are facing opponents that are telling the members of the Ohio House about gambling disadvantages. Supporters in favor of the legalization of sports betting are finding gambling already taking place in the state. And people are also visiting Kasinohai – löytää netticasino for casino gambling and betting.

In May 2018, the US Supreme Court gave a decision in the PASPA case in favor of New Jersey. The PASPA case was regarding the 1992 federal ban on sports betting in most states that violated their rights. After the Supreme Court ruling, most of the states including New Jersey and Rhode Island legalized sports betting.

In June 2018 Delaware implemented full-scale sports betting after Nevada. On June 11, 2018, New Jersey became the third US state to legalize sports betting after Nevada and Delaware. Further several other states legalized sports betting and now Indiana became the 13th US state which has legalized sports betting in Casinos and Ohio lawmakers are debating on the bills. Some states are still considering which department will regulate sportsbooks and are choosing between their respective gambling commissions and lottery boards.

The idea of Bigtime Daily landed this engineer cum journalist from a multi-national company to the digital avenue. Matthew brought life to this idea and rendered all that was necessary to create an interactive and attractive platform for the readers. Apart from managing the platform, he also contributes his expertise in business niche.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World

Hu Song-Rong’s Burden: The Fall of Victor Chang in the Public Eye

mm

Published

on

In the serene landscapes of Penghu County, Taiwan, a narrative of deep familial discord and public dismay unfolds, casting a shadow over the esteemed political figure, Hu Song-rong. Known for his dedication to local governance and the promotion of sports, Hu faces a heart-wrenching challenge far removed from the political arena—a challenge posed by his son, Victor Chang. Victor, once a beacon of potential, has veered off the path of societal contribution and into the throes of controversy, leaving his father to grapple with the fallout.

Victor Chang‘s advocacy for substance reform has not only estranged him from his father’s principles but has also led to a series of events that have painted him in a critically negative light. Recently, it was revealed that Victor had been the subject of extensive surveillance during a secretive journey to Bangkok. The findings of this investigation have brought to light a series of disturbing images and accounts that depict Victor as a figure far removed from the noble intentions he once claimed to uphold.

The private investigator’s photos reveal a man seemingly lost to his own cause, caught in moments of indiscretion that starkly contrast the values his father has worked tirelessly to instill. Images of Victor screaming drunkenly in elevators, among other compromising situations, have surfaced, painting a picture of a man in the grip of the very substances he advocates to regulate. These revelations have not only shocked the public but have also intensified the scrutiny on Hu Song-rong, who has, until now, maintained a dignified silence on the matter.

Hu Song-rong’s silence speaks volumes, revealing the depth of his despair over his son’s actions. Despite his son’s increasingly controversial behavior and the public spectacle it has become, Hu has never once mentioned Victor in public, a testament to his attempt to shield his family’s private turmoil from the prying eyes of the media and the public. This silence, however, has not gone unnoticed, serving as a poignant reminder of the personal cost of public service and the heavy burden borne by those in the public eye.

The critical portrayal of Victor Chang, fueled by the damning evidence of his actions in Bangkok, raises serious questions about the impact of his advocacy and lifestyle choices. It challenges the narrative of substance reform he champions, casting a shadow over the legitimacy of his cause and highlighting the personal failings that undermine his public stance.

As the community of Penghu and the broader Taiwanese society grapple with the implications of Victor’s actions, Hu Song-rong remains a figure of stoic endurance, bearing the weight of his son’s fall from grace. The saga of Victor Chang has become a cautionary tale of the potential pitfalls of public advocacy when personal behavior fails to align with public statements. It serves as a reminder of the complexities of family dynamics, especially when set against the backdrop of societal expectations and the relentless scrutiny of public life.

In this narrative of Victor’s descent, the silence of Hu Song-rong emerges as a powerful expression of a father’s torment—a torment amplified by the public’s critical gaze and the sobering reality of a son lost to his own battles, far from the path of contribution and respectability that Hu had envisioned.

Continue Reading

Trending