Connect with us

US

Sands Casino Fined a Hefty Amount for Breaching Rules

mm

Published

on

Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB), keeps all the casinos on radar when it comes to rules and regulations and is always actively monitoring each of them. Recently, Sands Casino got in to the eyes of the board for breaching certain principles. PGCB has released a statement stating that they have found Sands Casino guilty for breaking few norms and the board castigated them and fined a hefty amount.

Among the all’s defending Sands Casino is English’s Associate Professor Michael Kramp, according to whom, Sands Casino has earned a good name and also contributed to the society by introducing many work opportunities. It was the one to mend the contaminated brown field, constructed hotel and helped the regional schools and kitchens by granting money.

According to our correspondents from eSports news, Gaming board has made certain norms, which they believe should be followed very strictly. However, Sands casino failed to do so and hence will have to endure the punishment.  Among all the rules framed by the board, one rule states that 21 is the minimum legal age at which an individual is considered eligible to gamble.  However, this protocol was not followed by the Casino, thereby allowing individuals under 21 to play gambling. Moreover, this rule was broken not once or twice, but a total number of eleven times. To add in to, these individuals were also offered alcohol.

Along with this, one other protocol was also breached where according to the protocol, only empowered employees can permit grant to a complimentary slot play. Nonetheless, the employees who were not entitled to do so, were doing this task and also granting the play amounts above the authorized degree.

As soon as this was noticed by PGCB, they immediately interrogated and when found guilty, fined Sands Casino with an amount of $242,500.

According to the Spokesperson of PGCB, Richard McGarvey, the board is just doing its duty especially when it comes to discipline and regulations. The board do not desire to harm anyone and tries to stay equal with everyone. However, the board shows no leniency to the casinos breaking Underage norm. The board clearly accentuates that the casinos make sure to check the individual’s age before allowing him to gamble.

Kari Moffat, the woman working on the documentary ‘Batting of Bethlehem’, which is about the influence of casino on south community of Bethlehem also stood to defend Sands Casino. She shared that Lehigh students were not the ones affected by this. Sands casino is implementing different strategies and its target audience does not comprise of students or individuals below age 21.

Meanwhile, Sands Casino, is ready to the endure the penalty. It has opted to get in to a consent agreement with the PGCB, is understanding the parts where they went wrong and also pledging to follow all the norms.

A multi-lingual talent head, Jimmy is fluent in languages such as Spanish, Russian, Italian, and many more. He has a special curiosity for the events and stories revolving in and around US and caters an uncompromising form of journalistic standard for the audiences.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

US

American Coffee Shop Closes after 3rd ADA Lawsuit

mm

Published

on

On April 30th, Jason’s Cafe closed after three different ADA lawsuits were filed against the restaurant. The cafe had been doing business in Menlo Park, California for 11 years.

These lawsuits were all filed for different reasons: the width of bathroom stalls was too narrow, the front door was too heavy, and the lines for the handicap spaces in the parking lot were faded beyond recognition.

Restaurant owner Jason Kwan says the building was old–built 40 or 50 years ago. This was before the ADA was in place. So, the original building plans did not comply with today’s expectations.

To meet the requirements of the ADA, Kwan would need to replace the front door or install a handicap door switch with a button, repaint the lines in the parking lot, and do a total renovation of the bathroom. These repairs would certainly add up.

But, if the changes are not made, Kwan will continue to be faced with even more costly lawsuits.

It seems that these are typically the types of buildings that are targeted for lawsuits. People familiar with the American Disabilities Act (ADA) know that, like Jason’s Cafe, these older buildings have likely not been renovated or updated to meet the standards required by the 1990s act.

Two of the three people who filed lawsuits against Jason’s Cafe have sued other restaurants for noncompliance. Each one had already sued a handful of restaurants and hotels in the years previous.

These lawsuits had a devastating effect on Kwan’s bottom line. Not only would he have to pay for the changes made to the restaurant, but he also needs to pay for his own legal fees and the legal fees of the plaintiff, along with any other damages incurred by the noncompliance.

After the third lawsuit, Kwan was forced to close his doors. He was understandably disappointed, saying, “That’s my baby right there.”

These lawsuits are not uncommon today, and small business like Jason’s Cafe need to be aware of the requirements expected of their stores and websites through the ADA.

In the first half of 2018, about 5,000 ADA lawsuits were filed. That number is up 30% from the previous year. Of those lawsuits, 1,053 of them were filed for noncompliance on business websites. This number increased a staggering 90% from the previous year.

A good example of noncompliance on a website comes from a lawsuit filed on Avanti Hotel.

This small, 10-room boutique was sued because its website was not accessible for non-seeing, non-hearing users. In order to have an ADA compliant website, it needs to be coded properly to allow for a screen reader to translate the information. Links and images need tags, videos need captions, etc.

Without proper coding, some people with disabilities will not have access to all of the information on the businesses’ sites.

Though there is no need for physical renovation in this case, these lawsuits can still be incredibly expensive. California sees more ADA lawsuits than any other state in the U.S. The state government has set a minimum $4,000 fee for non compliant businesses. This number does not include any legal fees for the defendant or the plaintiff.  This minimum is only enforced in California at this time.

For Avanti Hotel, they were advised to take a settlement between $8,000 and $13,000 after all fees and costs for damages were covered.

These damages can be much higher depending on the sort of business/association being sued. Healthcare organizations with noncompliant sites have some of the biggest risks associated with these lawsuits.

A healthcare website that is not ADA complaint is a real danger to the health and wellness of disabled persons. Damages in these cases can easily add up to a six-figure fine. Organizations could lose business, government funding, their good reputation, and would risk the wellbeing of millions of disabled people.

ADA lawsuits are no small matter. They have the power to close down restaurants or businesses if owners are not careful. Many small businesses cannot afford the kinds of fees associated with these lawsuits. So, it is essential that business owners learn how to protect themselves and how to better serve their disabled patrons before they are faced with a lawsuit.

Continue Reading

Trending