Connect with us


Skewdeck is now favorite brand of almost all indian crickters




The clothing brand offers a wide range of street wear which is loved by ipl and domestic level cricketers.

Clothing brands in India are on the rise, as there are now thousands of clothing brands in the country, up from just a handful in the early 2000s. This growth is likely because of a number of factors, including increasing affluence, a growing middle class, and the country’s large population. One of the most popular clothing brands in India is Skewdeck, which has been in the business for the past few months and has already made a huge impact with its vast range of clothing which includes t-shirts, shirts, jackets, jeans, shorts, skirts, and much more.

Skewdeck is one of the fastest growing street wear brand in India, providing high quality street wear at an affordable price. The company was founded by Raunak Singh who had a passion for fashion and wanted to use his knowledge to help others look good while wearing their clothes. After years of delving deep into the workings of the industry and grasping it well, he finally launched his first store in Odisha, and has since then taken its growth story to the next level.

Skewdeck is perfect for people who are looking for casual wear but are not ready to spend thousands on designer brands yet. It offers a wide range of street wear at unbelievably low prices, which is its USP. The brand is known for its trendy, modern and edgy designs and style which caters to a large number of client base. The clothing brand believes in providing the customer with an array of products to choose from at an affordable price point. Each of their clothing is made from high quality materials and are comfortable to wear. The garments are made by using top quality fabrics which make them durable and long-lasting.

Skewdeck is perhaps one of the most popular clothing brands in India which has seen success within a short span of time of its launch.

Many cricketers are wearning and posting it on instagram and telling people to purchase it.

Rosario is from New York and has worked with leading companies like Microsoft as a copy-writer in the past. Now he spends his time writing for readers of

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


What “Reasonable Person” Standard Is Applicable When Determining Negligence?




In order to determine negligence, the reasonable person test asks if a person’s actions are consistent with what would be anticipated of a generally careful and sensible person in the same situation. Stated otherwise, did the accused act in a way that would have been expected of a reasonable person? 

In Florida, determining who is legally liable for an accident depends critically on the issue of carelessness. The “reasonable person standard” is the foundation of this assessment. Your personal injury lawyer can explain the “reasonable person standard” and how it can apply to your case if you are hurt in an accident in Florida. 

The Reasonable Person Standard: What Is It?

Legally speaking, the reasonable person standard offers a yardstick by which someone’s actions are assessed in cases of negligence. “How would a reasonable person have acted under the same circumstances?” is the central question it poses. Jurors and judges are asked this question in order to assist them in determining whether a person’s acts (or inactions) fall short of the expected standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would follow.

Like in many other jurisdictions, Florida does not base its reasonable person criterion on what an especially cautious or risk-averse person would do. Rather, it represents the behaviors of a composite of what the community expects of each individual. A reasonable individual would, for example, observe traffic laws when driving, heed warning signs, and refrain from needlessly endangering other people.

Utilizing the Reasonable Person Standard to Determine Negligence

The activities of the parties involved in a personal injury lawsuit are rigorously examined in light of this reasonable person standard. If it is determined that an individual’s actions do not correspond with what a reasonable person would have done in the same situation, negligence has been proven.

According to the law, proof of someone’s negligence is insufficient; strong, convincing evidence is required. Your personal injury lawyer is essential to this procedure because they have to painstakingly gather evidence showing how the negligent party strayed from what a reasonable person would have done. Piecing together facts, testimony, and any footage or recordings that can definitively demonstrate that their activities were in violation of the recognized norms of safety and care is more important than simply focusing on what they did or did not do.

This proof could take the form of eyewitness statements that refute the version of events provided by the person at fault or security footage that captures the moment of negligence. Something as small as skipping a scheduled maintenance or ignoring a warning alert might have a big impact. Your personal injury attorney seeks to establish beyond a shadow of a doubt that the defendant’s acts were not just improper but directly caused others to be put in danger by providing a thorough picture of their negligence. 

How Does This Impact Your Case for Personal Injury?

In a personal injury case, knowing the reasonable person standard is essential. In the event of an accident, this standard might assist you in proving liability if you think the other person was careless.

You should be aware that your activities will be evaluated in comparison to the hypothetical reasonable person’s behavior in situations where you might be held culpable. It doesn’t matter what you meant or thought was appropriate; what matters is what the community would anticipate from someone in your situation.

Although navigating the complexities of the reasonable person standard might be challenging, Florida’s negligence law heavily relies on this standard. A fair appraisal of the facts is essential when seeking justice following an injury accident, and comprehending this criterion is crucial.

Continue Reading