Connect with us


Young Entrepreneur Ahmed Alamri (Mojomora) Turns Company ‘DARK’ Worldwide




Ahmed Alamri, a.k.a Mojomora (born September 5th, 1994) is an American internet entrepreneur and graphic designer widely known as founder of media company DARK. Ahmed also graduated with honors from a prestigious Law School located in San Diego, California with a legal focus on intellectual property law, copyright law, & trademarks.

His entrepreneurial motives began when he was just 15 after launching a location based social network in his small town of Selma, California. Ahmed would then go on to start selling websites and designing graphics for various companies, clothing brands, and law firms across the San Diego area.

These entrepreneurship tendencies have led Mojomora to where he is today. Currently, he is staying busy by running DARK and he’s currently in the process of launching a podcast series set to release sometime this year. Ahmed has worked with dozens of notable clients including Lexy Panterra, B Karma, Jordan Royale, Dora Rodriguez, Sean Mike Kelly, and several others.

Ahmed has been building the DARK brand which includes a full-service digital marketing agency, podcast and media outlet/publication that can be found here: DARK Magazine.

DARK also became most notable for its high quality designs including its signature digital magazine covers that have been shared by hundreds of thousands across Instagram.

Ahmed is one of the most driven and passionate individuals I’ve ever interviewed. He talks about how important it is for our younger generations to ‘tap in’ with their inner passions and aspirations.

“As a student of higher education, I think our institutions don’t do the best job at teaching students what’s really going on in the real world. With the most powerful devices sitting in our pockets; we can now learn anything our heart desires at the push of a button.”

Ahmed plans on making 2021 the biggest year yet for his media company DARK and I’m definitely sticking around to see what this kid does next.

You can read more about Ahmed Alamri (Mojomora) in this article on Disrupt Magazine.

Michelle has been a part of the journey ever since Bigtime Daily started. As a strong learner and passionate writer, she contributes her editing skills for the news agency. She also jots down intellectual pieces from categories such as science and health.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


What “Reasonable Person” Standard Is Applicable When Determining Negligence?




In order to determine negligence, the reasonable person test asks if a person’s actions are consistent with what would be anticipated of a generally careful and sensible person in the same situation. Stated otherwise, did the accused act in a way that would have been expected of a reasonable person? 

In Florida, determining who is legally liable for an accident depends critically on the issue of carelessness. The “reasonable person standard” is the foundation of this assessment. Your personal injury lawyer can explain the “reasonable person standard” and how it can apply to your case if you are hurt in an accident in Florida. 

The Reasonable Person Standard: What Is It?

Legally speaking, the reasonable person standard offers a yardstick by which someone’s actions are assessed in cases of negligence. “How would a reasonable person have acted under the same circumstances?” is the central question it poses. Jurors and judges are asked this question in order to assist them in determining whether a person’s acts (or inactions) fall short of the expected standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would follow.

Like in many other jurisdictions, Florida does not base its reasonable person criterion on what an especially cautious or risk-averse person would do. Rather, it represents the behaviors of a composite of what the community expects of each individual. A reasonable individual would, for example, observe traffic laws when driving, heed warning signs, and refrain from needlessly endangering other people.

Utilizing the Reasonable Person Standard to Determine Negligence

The activities of the parties involved in a personal injury lawsuit are rigorously examined in light of this reasonable person standard. If it is determined that an individual’s actions do not correspond with what a reasonable person would have done in the same situation, negligence has been proven.

According to the law, proof of someone’s negligence is insufficient; strong, convincing evidence is required. Your personal injury lawyer is essential to this procedure because they have to painstakingly gather evidence showing how the negligent party strayed from what a reasonable person would have done. Piecing together facts, testimony, and any footage or recordings that can definitively demonstrate that their activities were in violation of the recognized norms of safety and care is more important than simply focusing on what they did or did not do.

This proof could take the form of eyewitness statements that refute the version of events provided by the person at fault or security footage that captures the moment of negligence. Something as small as skipping a scheduled maintenance or ignoring a warning alert might have a big impact. Your personal injury attorney seeks to establish beyond a shadow of a doubt that the defendant’s acts were not just improper but directly caused others to be put in danger by providing a thorough picture of their negligence. 

How Does This Impact Your Case for Personal Injury?

In a personal injury case, knowing the reasonable person standard is essential. In the event of an accident, this standard might assist you in proving liability if you think the other person was careless.

You should be aware that your activities will be evaluated in comparison to the hypothetical reasonable person’s behavior in situations where you might be held culpable. It doesn’t matter what you meant or thought was appropriate; what matters is what the community would anticipate from someone in your situation.

Although navigating the complexities of the reasonable person standard might be challenging, Florida’s negligence law heavily relies on this standard. A fair appraisal of the facts is essential when seeking justice following an injury accident, and comprehending this criterion is crucial.

Continue Reading