Business

Is There A Fail-Proof Method For Instagram Growth?

Published

5 years ago

February 2, 2021

A lot of people claim to have the ultimate secret to building the perfect Instagram accounts from scratch. All you have to do is run a quick Google search, and already you’ll find a host of pages claiming to offer this great secret that no one else in the world possesses.

Some will even ask you to pay for it. But before you proceed in doing so, it is always useful to wonder whether or not this Instagram holy grail exists in the first place.

So is there a perfect growth method for building Instagram accounts from scratch? Well, the answer is no. Before you get too disappointed, though, you should know that this is not saying, by any means, that growing an Instagram account from scratch is possible.

On the contrary, it is, in fact, possible; however, the only caveat is that if you’re looking for a single, all-around, fail-proof method to build your accounts, you might fail from scratch. The secret, then, according to extensive research, is to employ a host of different techniques and then make them all work for you.

Building Instagram Accounts From Scratch – Starting From Base

The hardest part of growth on Instagram, just like most living areas, lies in the beginning. Getting your account up and running from the start is quite tricky. Once you start building numbers, though, things become a lot easier as you reach many more people.

So how do you build from the base? Some of the options to consider include:

Great Content

As many people will tell you, growth on Instagram, as it is with a lot of other social media platforms, begins with providing users with great content. Once you have this ready, you can then start to combine different methods that get people to notice your account and the unique content you have to offer.

Moderate Actions

Actions that you can perform to get people to notice you on Twitter include: liking posts, commenting, viewing stories, and of course, sending a direct message. You have to be careful, though, because doing too much of any of these may be seen as spamming and can get your account banned.

Buying Real Followers

Buying real followers on Instagram may be what you need to give you that initial boost that keeps your page growing organically. Like the above, though, you should always ensure not to get fake followers, which tends to destroy your engagement and have you flagged significantly.

The secret is to get real followers who weren’t bots and interact, just like you get with Famoid followers.

Selective Following

Selectively following interested users in your niche can also get you noticed at the beginning and get them to follow you back once they visit your profile and see that your content is excellent. Again, you have to be careful not to follow too many people in a short period, as this is classified as spam and may get you an action block.

Outreach

Lastly, another way to build an Instagram account from scratch is through outreach to other more significant accounts in your niche. Ideally, you want to select a micro-influencer with too many followers but just enough, say, from 20,000 to 50,000.

You can, of course, reach more significant accounts depending on your budget.

Business

Click for Counsel: YesLawyer Wants to Make Lawyers as Accessible as Wi-Fi

Published

5 days ago

April 1, 2026

Matthew Wiles

Photo Courtesy of: YesLawyer

Byline: Andi Stark

For many people facing a legal problem, the most difficult part is not understanding their rights but finding a lawyer willing to speak with them in the first place. Long wait times, unclear pricing, and administrative hurdles often delay even the most basic consultations. YesLawyer, an AI-enabled plaintiff firm operating across all 50 states, is testing whether technology can shorten that gap.

Founded in 2024 by 25-year-old entrepreneur Rob Epstein, the platform offers free intake, automated screening, and, in many cases, same-day conversations with licensed attorneys. The idea is simple: reduce the friction between a client’s first request for help and an actual legal discussion. In this interview, Epstein explains how the system works, where artificial intelligence fits into the process, and what problems the company is trying to address in the broader legal system

Q: When you say you want lawyers to be “as accessible as Wi-Fi,” what does that mean in practical terms?

A: It’s a way of describing speed and availability. Someone dealing with a workplace dispute, a serious injury, or an immigration issue should be able to move from an online form or phone call to a real conversation with counsel in hours, not weeks. YesLawyer is structured so that a client begins with a free case evaluation, goes through automated conflict checks and basic screening, and, in many instances, speaks with a lawyer the same day.

Q: How does the process work once someone contacts the platform?

A: We use a structured workflow. It starts with a short questionnaire and an initial conversation to capture basic facts. That information feeds into conflict checks and internal review. The system then proposes a match with a licensed attorney and provides a calendar link for a virtual consultation, often within 24 hours. After the meeting, the client receives a written legal plan outlining next steps, deadlines, and estimated fees.

Q: Where does artificial intelligence fit into that process, and where does it stop?

A: AI is used for organizing and routing information, not for giving legal advice. It helps with conflict checks at scale, case categorization, and structured summaries so attorneys can focus on the substance of the matter. Every consultation is conducted by a licensed lawyer, and all decisions about strategy or next steps are made by humans.

Q: What problem is this model trying to solve in the current legal system?

A: Delay and cost are still major barriers. Many civil plaintiffs face long waits just to get a first appointment, along with high retainers and hourly billing that make early legal advice risky. We try to respond with faster consultations, flat-fee options, and financing. The idea is to remove administrative friction so lawyers spend less time on logistics and more time speaking with clients.

Q: Some critics say platforms like this blur the line between a technology company and a law firm. How do you describe YesLawyer?

A: We describe ourselves as a national, AI-enabled plaintiff firm that connects clients with independent attorneys. That structure does raise regulatory questions, especially around responsibility and oversight. We focus on licensing verification, attorney-written case plans, and clear communication about fees and services.

Q: You’ve said the main bottleneck is “systems” rather than people. What do you mean by that?

A: The issue isn’t that lawyers don’t want to help more people. It’s that the systems around them make it hard to scale their time. Intake, scheduling, and document handling take hours. Automating those parts means attorneys can handle more matters without being overwhelmed by repetitive tasks.

Q: Does this model risk favoring only the most profitable cases?

A: That’s a real concern in legal technology. Automation often works best for repeatable, high-volume disputes. Our view is that lowering administrative cost can actually make it easier to take on smaller or more complex cases that might otherwise be turned away. Whether that holds over time depends on the data.

Measuring Impact Over Time

YesLawyer’s attempt to compress the timeline between inquiry and consultation reflects broader changes in how legal services are being delivered. As artificial intelligence becomes more common in administrative work, firms are experimenting with new ways to reduce wait times and clarify costs.

The company’s early growth suggests that many clients value faster access to an initial conversation, even before considering long-term representation. Whether this platform-based model becomes widely adopted or remains one of several emerging approaches will depend on regulatory developments, lawyer participation, and measurable outcomes for clients. For now, YesLawyer’s experiment highlights a central question in modern legal practice: how quickly can help realistically be made available to the people who need it.