Connect with us

Lifestyle

Corporate Leader Sezgin Mangjuka Promoting Business of Clients Digitally

mm

Published

on

Sezgin Mangjuka, the Founder and CEO of Pixatronix, now has carved out an unique place for himself as a top Social Media personality, marketing expert and digital entrepreneur.

Born in Kosovo, Sezgin Mangjuka runs his full-service digital media company which is helping his clients to grow in business in novel ways formulated by him.

An expert in projecting a product, service and a company globally through digital platforms, Sezgin Mangjuka is especially known for enabling his clients convert their business enquiries into actual sales thus promoting their business.

Adopting a new business module powered by digital presence of his clients on the social media, the company of Sezgin Mangjuka Pixatronix has emerged as one of the most successful digital marketing companies of Kosovo.

Here, the wide vision and mission of Sezgin Mangjuka to serve his clients grow in business comes most prominently. In fact, Pixatronix diversified itself under his guidance to acquire its name in Kosovo. 

Sezgin Mangjuka is a self-made man who never succumbed to failure. When he could not succeed to complete Class 10, his dream for a bright future dwindled. His further lost hopes when he could not pass Class 12. He, did not, however lose hope.

After hard struggle and constant efforts, Sezgin Mangjuka ultimately succeeded in becoming the most dynamic young Social Media Manager in Kosovo. He is a first generation entrepreneur who made it big at an early age.

Sezgin Mangjuka scripted his own success story which is unique in a sense as he began his entrepreneurial life at the age of 17 years to launch his company Pixatronix in 2016. As he had no money, he borrowed a small sum from his father to launch an online community.

The rest is a history that he created himself. Today, he is an influencer and also a mentor for others. For the youth in Kosovo, he is an icon for he achieved major success in digital marketing in a short span of time through his fortitude, business acumen and dream of becoming a successful entrepreneur.

His success, however, did not very easy. He initially worked as a journalist, switched on to public relations, and finally launched his own digital marketing company. He brought several of his clients including the celebrities to prominence through the social media.

Sezgin Mangjuka has over 30,000 followers in his Instagram handle.

Michelle has been a part of the journey ever since Bigtime Daily started. As a strong learner and passionate writer, she contributes her editing skills for the news agency. She also jots down intellectual pieces from categories such as science and health.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Lifestyle

What “Reasonable Person” Standard Is Applicable When Determining Negligence?

mm

Published

on

In order to determine negligence, the reasonable person test asks if a person’s actions are consistent with what would be anticipated of a generally careful and sensible person in the same situation. Stated otherwise, did the accused act in a way that would have been expected of a reasonable person? 

In Florida, determining who is legally liable for an accident depends critically on the issue of carelessness. The “reasonable person standard” is the foundation of this assessment. Your personal injury lawyer can explain the “reasonable person standard” and how it can apply to your case if you are hurt in an accident in Florida. 

The Reasonable Person Standard: What Is It?

Legally speaking, the reasonable person standard offers a yardstick by which someone’s actions are assessed in cases of negligence. “How would a reasonable person have acted under the same circumstances?” is the central question it poses. Jurors and judges are asked this question in order to assist them in determining whether a person’s acts (or inactions) fall short of the expected standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would follow.

Like in many other jurisdictions, Florida does not base its reasonable person criterion on what an especially cautious or risk-averse person would do. Rather, it represents the behaviors of a composite of what the community expects of each individual. A reasonable individual would, for example, observe traffic laws when driving, heed warning signs, and refrain from needlessly endangering other people.

Utilizing the Reasonable Person Standard to Determine Negligence

The activities of the parties involved in a personal injury lawsuit are rigorously examined in light of this reasonable person standard. If it is determined that an individual’s actions do not correspond with what a reasonable person would have done in the same situation, negligence has been proven.

According to the law, proof of someone’s negligence is insufficient; strong, convincing evidence is required. Your personal injury lawyer is essential to this procedure because they have to painstakingly gather evidence showing how the negligent party strayed from what a reasonable person would have done. Piecing together facts, testimony, and any footage or recordings that can definitively demonstrate that their activities were in violation of the recognized norms of safety and care is more important than simply focusing on what they did or did not do.

This proof could take the form of eyewitness statements that refute the version of events provided by the person at fault or security footage that captures the moment of negligence. Something as small as skipping a scheduled maintenance or ignoring a warning alert might have a big impact. Your personal injury attorney seeks to establish beyond a shadow of a doubt that the defendant’s acts were not just improper but directly caused others to be put in danger by providing a thorough picture of their negligence. 

How Does This Impact Your Case for Personal Injury?

In a personal injury case, knowing the reasonable person standard is essential. In the event of an accident, this standard might assist you in proving liability if you think the other person was careless.

You should be aware that your activities will be evaluated in comparison to the hypothetical reasonable person’s behavior in situations where you might be held culpable. It doesn’t matter what you meant or thought was appropriate; what matters is what the community would anticipate from someone in your situation.

Although navigating the complexities of the reasonable person standard might be challenging, Florida’s negligence law heavily relies on this standard. A fair appraisal of the facts is essential when seeking justice following an injury accident, and comprehending this criterion is crucial.

Continue Reading

Trending