Connect with us


For Fitness Expert Alexandre Marx Carneiro, Health is about Consistency and not Social Image




Alex Carneiro

People like to achieve a healthy lifestyle through books, YouTube, references from friends, advertisements, as well as social media. While celebrities who have access to contacts and money generally opt for a trainer and nutrition specialist to get results and then remain consistent with the lifestyle.

One of such examples of a lifestyle and fitness coach is Brazilian native Alexandre Marx Carneiro, who is a well known and leading trainer in the U.S. He has clients and followers all over the world. Carneiro is known to transform bodies. His specialty lies in creating action like physiques for his clients. His expertise is in health, nutrition and kinesiology.

Carneiro has been coaching many celebrities around the world since long. His fitness journey started when he was just 17 years old. He has been learning and acquiring knowledge since then and has been helping people become healthy and fit. Anatomy, body building and training people are his passions. He loves to train and guide people.

2017 saw Carneiro releasing his first book ‘Fitting In- The Mask of Health‘ that examined the crisis of modern social image in the health realm and also opening a personal training studio with his fiancée in Denver. The studio is now one of the top fitness studios in the US. Carneiro has been hosting various television fitness programs and providing advice on healthy eating habits and how can everyone improve their fitness.

The fitness expert has made noting presence in various fitness magazines from Muscle & Body, MuscleMag, Revista Fisico, to Muscle in Form in the US and more than 40 appearances in international magazines like Muscle & Fitness, Men’s Health, Men’s Fitness, Men’s Exercise, and many, many more.

The idea of Bigtime Daily landed this engineer cum journalist from a multi-national company to the digital avenue. Matthew brought life to this idea and rendered all that was necessary to create an interactive and attractive platform for the readers. Apart from managing the platform, he also contributes his expertise in business niche.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


What “Reasonable Person” Standard Is Applicable When Determining Negligence?




In order to determine negligence, the reasonable person test asks if a person’s actions are consistent with what would be anticipated of a generally careful and sensible person in the same situation. Stated otherwise, did the accused act in a way that would have been expected of a reasonable person? 

In Florida, determining who is legally liable for an accident depends critically on the issue of carelessness. The “reasonable person standard” is the foundation of this assessment. Your personal injury lawyer can explain the “reasonable person standard” and how it can apply to your case if you are hurt in an accident in Florida. 

The Reasonable Person Standard: What Is It?

Legally speaking, the reasonable person standard offers a yardstick by which someone’s actions are assessed in cases of negligence. “How would a reasonable person have acted under the same circumstances?” is the central question it poses. Jurors and judges are asked this question in order to assist them in determining whether a person’s acts (or inactions) fall short of the expected standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would follow.

Like in many other jurisdictions, Florida does not base its reasonable person criterion on what an especially cautious or risk-averse person would do. Rather, it represents the behaviors of a composite of what the community expects of each individual. A reasonable individual would, for example, observe traffic laws when driving, heed warning signs, and refrain from needlessly endangering other people.

Utilizing the Reasonable Person Standard to Determine Negligence

The activities of the parties involved in a personal injury lawsuit are rigorously examined in light of this reasonable person standard. If it is determined that an individual’s actions do not correspond with what a reasonable person would have done in the same situation, negligence has been proven.

According to the law, proof of someone’s negligence is insufficient; strong, convincing evidence is required. Your personal injury lawyer is essential to this procedure because they have to painstakingly gather evidence showing how the negligent party strayed from what a reasonable person would have done. Piecing together facts, testimony, and any footage or recordings that can definitively demonstrate that their activities were in violation of the recognized norms of safety and care is more important than simply focusing on what they did or did not do.

This proof could take the form of eyewitness statements that refute the version of events provided by the person at fault or security footage that captures the moment of negligence. Something as small as skipping a scheduled maintenance or ignoring a warning alert might have a big impact. Your personal injury attorney seeks to establish beyond a shadow of a doubt that the defendant’s acts were not just improper but directly caused others to be put in danger by providing a thorough picture of their negligence. 

How Does This Impact Your Case for Personal Injury?

In a personal injury case, knowing the reasonable person standard is essential. In the event of an accident, this standard might assist you in proving liability if you think the other person was careless.

You should be aware that your activities will be evaluated in comparison to the hypothetical reasonable person’s behavior in situations where you might be held culpable. It doesn’t matter what you meant or thought was appropriate; what matters is what the community would anticipate from someone in your situation.

Although navigating the complexities of the reasonable person standard might be challenging, Florida’s negligence law heavily relies on this standard. A fair appraisal of the facts is essential when seeking justice following an injury accident, and comprehending this criterion is crucial.

Continue Reading