Connect with us

Lifestyle

Healthcare Leader Avantika Sharma Reveals How Digital Tech Solutions Can Improve Prior Authorization Procedures

mm

Published

on

One of the most necessary and standard procedures in the healthcare industry is Prior Authorization (PA), which requires healthcare providers to obtain approval for a treatment or medication before delivering it to a patient. Unfortunately, PA is also one of the most inefficient processes in the healthcare industry and is currently facing a crisis. 

This year, 70% of medical groups attested that PA claims increased, yet, at the same time, a study by the University of Colorado found that 93% of providers reported delays in care due to drawn-out PA processes. In short, claims are increasing, and one of the side effects is that delays are becoming more notable, if not longer. This is due to long-standing inefficiencies and problems swept under the rug for years, resulting in longer patient waiting times, increased burden on administrative staff, and even physician and clinician burnout. 

At Brillio One Health, Healthcare Leader Avantika Sharma and her team are working towards streamlining and optimizing healthcare systems like PA to benefit healthcare providers, insurance payers, and, of course, patients. They work with international healthcare organizations to “covert digital disruptions into solutions that can position payers and providers ahead of the curve.” 

She views the current workflow required to obtain PA for a procedure or treatment to be an area that requires extensive digital reform. According to Sharma, “technologically automating the Prior Authorization process at the level of providers and payers can drastically improve the patient experience by getting on-time approvals before surgery and reducing operational and administrative costs.”

The PA process is currently plagued by administrative complexities, time-consuming manual procedures, liabilities due to human error, and excess use of valuable resources. To illustrate, most documents are faxed or emailed and require physical signatures, even though the digital resources to replace those aspects of the process are well established. Not to mention using manual technologies to transmit documents has already been proven to be more likely to lead to incorrect information, missing documents, and excessive back-and-forth communication. 

All that communication is done by large teams of administrators, who spend considerable time sorting and verifying numerous documents from different sources. This puts a huge burden on hospitals and insurance companies to staff those teams accordingly. It also contributes to complexity and redundancy on an administrative level. 

There are also confidentiality issues that come with using manual systems to complete PA claims. According to Sharma, “using fax to transmit prior authorization forms minimizes the legal requirement to keep medical information confidential since it involves the production of a printed piece of paper that can be easily seen or taken by anyone walking past the machine when it prints or someone’s desk where it is awaiting processing.” 

Even more alarming is the lack of coordination between the systems used by payers and providers. Despite the amount of communication required between these two entities to get a single claim passed, the current systems can vary from one organization to another. For example, 15 different providers might use 15 different websites, each with unique software and login information. 

Sharma believes that adopting digital solutions on the part of providers and payers could result in major improvements in the PA process. Brillio’s human-centric approach includes the design and implementation of systems powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), and Natural Language Processing (NLP), among other technologies. These innovative systems are already present in our daily lives but can be combined to create efficient, constantly evolving solutions that benefit the healthcare industry. 

Proposed solutions would certainly include the creation of standard systems for communication between payers and providers. An example of this is online portals and digital software that is standardized across all platforms. Optimizing this software would allow relevant personnel from both the medical and the insurance side to use their secure username and password to access the same PA documents, at different stages of the process. Other solutions might be using NLP to convert doctors’ notes into text compatible with online forms or using AI to develop approval processes for documents, thereby cutting down on the administrative staff needed to verify every signature or document in a PA claim file. Using electronic signatures, electronic health records (EHR), and opting for digital file sending are all essential solutions as well.  

These solutions would be one piece in a larger movement that could radically change the healthcare industry in the United States. One rule introduced in early December 2022 by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services included the implementation of electronic PA processes for document attachments and signatures. It also included the required adoption of a Health Level 7 (HL7) Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources FHIR standard Application Programming Interface to support new digital systems. CMS predicted that implementing better digital systems, alongside other proposed solutions, for PA could save more than $15 billion over 10 years.

Most importantly, Sharma highlights the importance of putting the patient first. Lengthy PA processes can take days, if not weeks, to go through, and only a tiny fraction of them are approved without delays. Most PA claims are denied at the outset and require appeals and negotiation. A patient-centric healthcare system focuses on making sure sick people are given the care they need, when they need it, without waiting for their doctors and insurance providers to jump through hoops. 

For more information, visit www.brillioonehealth.com. 

Michelle has been a part of the journey ever since Bigtime Daily started. As a strong learner and passionate writer, she contributes her editing skills for the news agency. She also jots down intellectual pieces from categories such as science and health.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Lifestyle

What “Reasonable Person” Standard Is Applicable When Determining Negligence?

mm

Published

on

In order to determine negligence, the reasonable person test asks if a person’s actions are consistent with what would be anticipated of a generally careful and sensible person in the same situation. Stated otherwise, did the accused act in a way that would have been expected of a reasonable person? 

In Florida, determining who is legally liable for an accident depends critically on the issue of carelessness. The “reasonable person standard” is the foundation of this assessment. Your personal injury lawyer can explain the “reasonable person standard” and how it can apply to your case if you are hurt in an accident in Florida. 

The Reasonable Person Standard: What Is It?

Legally speaking, the reasonable person standard offers a yardstick by which someone’s actions are assessed in cases of negligence. “How would a reasonable person have acted under the same circumstances?” is the central question it poses. Jurors and judges are asked this question in order to assist them in determining whether a person’s acts (or inactions) fall short of the expected standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would follow.

Like in many other jurisdictions, Florida does not base its reasonable person criterion on what an especially cautious or risk-averse person would do. Rather, it represents the behaviors of a composite of what the community expects of each individual. A reasonable individual would, for example, observe traffic laws when driving, heed warning signs, and refrain from needlessly endangering other people.

Utilizing the Reasonable Person Standard to Determine Negligence

The activities of the parties involved in a personal injury lawsuit are rigorously examined in light of this reasonable person standard. If it is determined that an individual’s actions do not correspond with what a reasonable person would have done in the same situation, negligence has been proven.

According to the law, proof of someone’s negligence is insufficient; strong, convincing evidence is required. Your personal injury lawyer is essential to this procedure because they have to painstakingly gather evidence showing how the negligent party strayed from what a reasonable person would have done. Piecing together facts, testimony, and any footage or recordings that can definitively demonstrate that their activities were in violation of the recognized norms of safety and care is more important than simply focusing on what they did or did not do.

This proof could take the form of eyewitness statements that refute the version of events provided by the person at fault or security footage that captures the moment of negligence. Something as small as skipping a scheduled maintenance or ignoring a warning alert might have a big impact. Your personal injury attorney seeks to establish beyond a shadow of a doubt that the defendant’s acts were not just improper but directly caused others to be put in danger by providing a thorough picture of their negligence. 

How Does This Impact Your Case for Personal Injury?

In a personal injury case, knowing the reasonable person standard is essential. In the event of an accident, this standard might assist you in proving liability if you think the other person was careless.

You should be aware that your activities will be evaluated in comparison to the hypothetical reasonable person’s behavior in situations where you might be held culpable. It doesn’t matter what you meant or thought was appropriate; what matters is what the community would anticipate from someone in your situation.

Although navigating the complexities of the reasonable person standard might be challenging, Florida’s negligence law heavily relies on this standard. A fair appraisal of the facts is essential when seeking justice following an injury accident, and comprehending this criterion is crucial.

Continue Reading

Trending