Connect with us


NC Rapper Kidd Lee is someone you might want to know about




This Gen Z Female artist is known as “Kidd Lee,” is really making herself known and making a name for herself. She is from Wilmington, North Carolina, and she is 18 years old. Kidd Lee started making music at only the age of 7, and she was inspired to make music from the rappers Tupac Shakur, Biggie Smalls, Lil P-Nut, and most of all, God was her most significant influence. Kidd Lee grew up in the church, and she started out as a Christian rapper, and she would then go on to perform at many church events at such a young age. Kidd Lee is one of the most inspiring female rappers out right now, mainly to be so young. Her music mostly talks about real issues and mental health and not only that. She also has some fun in her music, and she changes up rhythms and flows. She is very versatile with what she does. Kidd Lee made headlines a few months back about a rap music competition she won with the app “Triller” this competition was called the step up to the mic competition, and you can now find her face as the winner. If you go to any boost mobile stores as of right now, you can even see one of her music videos up on display! This artist is definitely someone you want to check out. You will not regret it. This day in time, hip hop sensation Kidd Lee is putting out many songs that you definitely want to listen to and is working on putting out visuals. You may remember this artist’s face because she was one of the performers at the jake Paul and Ben Askren boxing match. She was also a performer at the Miami Trillerfest back in May 2021. Kidd’s manager at the time is Charlene Bryant, who is also the manager of rapper “Trippie Redd”; we’re not sure if Kidd Lee is signed to any labels as of right now, but we are more than confident they will be rushing in soon. Check out Kidd Lee for yourself on Youtube, Twitter, Spotify, Apple Music.

This artist makes amazing music, and It’s no doubt that she will soon be a viral name, so hop on the Kidd Lee train and hear her remarkable lyrics and follow her on this music journey.

Rosario is from New York and has worked with leading companies like Microsoft as a copy-writer in the past. Now he spends his time writing for readers of

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


What “Reasonable Person” Standard Is Applicable When Determining Negligence?




In order to determine negligence, the reasonable person test asks if a person’s actions are consistent with what would be anticipated of a generally careful and sensible person in the same situation. Stated otherwise, did the accused act in a way that would have been expected of a reasonable person? 

In Florida, determining who is legally liable for an accident depends critically on the issue of carelessness. The “reasonable person standard” is the foundation of this assessment. Your personal injury lawyer can explain the “reasonable person standard” and how it can apply to your case if you are hurt in an accident in Florida. 

The Reasonable Person Standard: What Is It?

Legally speaking, the reasonable person standard offers a yardstick by which someone’s actions are assessed in cases of negligence. “How would a reasonable person have acted under the same circumstances?” is the central question it poses. Jurors and judges are asked this question in order to assist them in determining whether a person’s acts (or inactions) fall short of the expected standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would follow.

Like in many other jurisdictions, Florida does not base its reasonable person criterion on what an especially cautious or risk-averse person would do. Rather, it represents the behaviors of a composite of what the community expects of each individual. A reasonable individual would, for example, observe traffic laws when driving, heed warning signs, and refrain from needlessly endangering other people.

Utilizing the Reasonable Person Standard to Determine Negligence

The activities of the parties involved in a personal injury lawsuit are rigorously examined in light of this reasonable person standard. If it is determined that an individual’s actions do not correspond with what a reasonable person would have done in the same situation, negligence has been proven.

According to the law, proof of someone’s negligence is insufficient; strong, convincing evidence is required. Your personal injury lawyer is essential to this procedure because they have to painstakingly gather evidence showing how the negligent party strayed from what a reasonable person would have done. Piecing together facts, testimony, and any footage or recordings that can definitively demonstrate that their activities were in violation of the recognized norms of safety and care is more important than simply focusing on what they did or did not do.

This proof could take the form of eyewitness statements that refute the version of events provided by the person at fault or security footage that captures the moment of negligence. Something as small as skipping a scheduled maintenance or ignoring a warning alert might have a big impact. Your personal injury attorney seeks to establish beyond a shadow of a doubt that the defendant’s acts were not just improper but directly caused others to be put in danger by providing a thorough picture of their negligence. 

How Does This Impact Your Case for Personal Injury?

In a personal injury case, knowing the reasonable person standard is essential. In the event of an accident, this standard might assist you in proving liability if you think the other person was careless.

You should be aware that your activities will be evaluated in comparison to the hypothetical reasonable person’s behavior in situations where you might be held culpable. It doesn’t matter what you meant or thought was appropriate; what matters is what the community would anticipate from someone in your situation.

Although navigating the complexities of the reasonable person standard might be challenging, Florida’s negligence law heavily relies on this standard. A fair appraisal of the facts is essential when seeking justice following an injury accident, and comprehending this criterion is crucial.

Continue Reading