Connect with us

Business

Why You Should Invest In The Online Educational Space

mm

Published

on

Douglas James is a highly successful entrepreneur and marketing expert who uses digital marketing to empower entrepreneurs to grow their businesses. Known as the“High Ticket Client Guy”, he specializes in working with businesses that sell high-ticket products or services, and helps them retain high-paying customers. A high-ticket field he focuses on is the online educational space, working with online coaches and course owners who charge thousands of dollars for their services. According to James, anyone who charges less than that is simply wasting your time.

“I focused heavily on the coaching market because a lot of people are definitely willing to pay for education,” says James. “Those industries are changing the game. A lot of people are starting to realize that you don’t need to go to school for X number of years and go into tens of thousands of dollars of debt to succeed.”

As the job market continues to evolve at a rapid rate, many people are turning to online courses to learn modern business skills and digital techniques that traditional tertiary institutions do not provide. According to an article by Forbes, these skills are just as, if not more valued, as traditional degrees. “When hiring, companies are now recognizing the value of certifications that come from specialized providers, as opposed to solely prioritizing those from traditional institutions. These tertiary providers are known to be just as capable, or even more so, of providing training as universities and colleges.”

With so many different online courses available right now, it may be tempting to choose the cheaper option. However, according to James, by paying less you’re actually wasting your money, because you won’t be getting the quality and attention of higher-priced courses. “I’ve seen people sell their education for $1000, which is cheap. I feel like that’s a disservice to the end-user, because if you’re selling a course for $1000 and you’re selling it to hundreds or even thousands of people, how much time can you actually dedicate towards each customer?” he asks.

According to James, you need to charge more to do more. “I always educate our clients to charge $5k or even $10k for their educational product, because if you collect more money from the student, you can provide additional support,” he says. “You can provide weekly calls, or you can actually hire people to give them one-on-one support. If they have or have any questions or if they need something, they have someone to reach out to.  People are willing to pay more for access instead of just a bunch of videos.”

In addition, more expensive courses will ensure more dedicated students. “From a consumer’s perspective, the more you pay, the more you pay attention,” says James.

 

Rosario is from New York and has worked with leading companies like Microsoft as a copy-writer in the past. Now he spends his time writing for readers of BigtimeDaily.com

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

MetaWorx: Building Full-Stack AI Teams, Not Just Automation

mm

Published

on

Automation still dominates most headlines, yet the returns often fail to meet expectations. A sprawling chatbot rollout might shave a few support tickets, but it rarely shifts the profit-and-loss statement in a lasting way. 

McKinsey’s 2025 workplace survey pegs AI’s long-term productivity upside at $4.4 trillion, but only one percent of enterprises say they’ve reached true “AI maturity.” MetaWorx, a Dallas, Texas-based AI employee agency founded by Rachel Kite, argues that the shortfall has nothing to do with models and everything to do with people. 

“Treat AI like a point solution and you’ll get point-solution results,” shares Kite. “You need a roster that can carry the ball from raw data to governance, or the whole thing stalls at the proof-of-concept phase.”

The pod blueprint

When a plug-and-play automation script collapsed under real-world data drift, costing Kite a lucrative contract, she sketched the six-person “pod” that now anchors every MetaWorx engagement:

  1. An infrastructure architect to tame compute costs.
  2. A data engineer to secure and shape pipelines. 
  3. An applied scientist to prototype models against live feedback loops. 
  4. An MLOps engineer to automate rollback and retraining. 
  5. A domain product lead translates forecasts into features users actually notice. 
  6. Ethics and compliance analysts to stress test outputs for bias and keep the audit. 

The team’s first sprint still delivers a quick-win bot — “small enough to calm the CFO,” jokes Kite — but the roadmap quickly pivots to reliability, explainability, and eventually optimization. By tying every algorithmic decision to a quantifiable business metric, the pods turn AI from a science project into a growth lever. 

Recruiting for curiosity, not credentials

With Bain & Company predicting a global AI-skills crunch through 2027, MetaWorx has stopped chasing unicorn résumés. Instead, it hires “adjacent athletes”: a computer-vision PhD who hops from medical imaging to warehouse surveillance, or a former journalist who recasts her nose for story into prompt-engineering finesse.

“Domain expertise expires fast,” Kite says. “What doesn’t expire is the instinct to ask better questions.” The result is a lattice of overlapping skills that stays flexible when models wander into the long tail of edge-case data.

A culture of rapid experiments

Inside MetaWorx, every idea faces the same litmus test: ship something — anything — into a user’s hands within 21 days. The “three-week rule” forces prototypes into the wild early, where failure is cheap and feedback is swift. Post-mortems, including cost overruns, are circulated company-wide, erasing any stigma associated with missteps.

That laboratory mindset powers velocity. “Our first model is almost always wrong,” Kite admits, “but version 1.0 is the tuition we pay for version 2.0.” The philosophy echoes her TEDx talk on resilience: progress is iterative, not heroic.

How leaders can steal the playbook

Executives itching to replicate MetaWorx’s results don’t need a blank check. Kite offers a five-step sequence:

  • Inventory pain points, not tools: Walk the P&L line by line and tag the friction you can measure.
  • Map the stack to the problem: A recommendation engine, for instance, requires behavior data, retraining triggers, and feedback capture — automation alone won’t suffice.
  • Stand up a pod: Reassign existing talent into a cross-functional tiger team before hiring externally; the chemistry test is free.
  • Measure the story, not just the statistic: Pair model accuracy with human-scale metrics like ticket backlog or employee churn.
  • Budget for the boring: Reserve at least 30 percent of spend for MLOps and governance; Stanford’s HAI review links most AI failures to neglected upkeep.

Taken together, those steps shift AI from a pilot novelty to an operational habit that compounds value rather than topping out after an initial PR splash.

Character still scales faster than code

MetaWorx plans to double its headcount this year, yet Kite insists the secret isn’t a proprietary framework or a monster war chest. It’s credibility. Clients see a founder who has wrestled with the same outages and surprise bills they face. That authenticity converts skeptics faster than any algorithmic novelty.

“Tools level out,” Kite says. “Culture compounds.”

The insight lands in a marketplace still dazzled by generative fireworks. Yes, MetaWorx ships models and dashboards, but its true product is a mindset: resilience over rigidity, questions over credentials, experiments over edicts. In Kite’s world, automation is merely the appetizer. The main course is a full-stack team that knows why the model matters to the business and who owns its success after launch day.

And that, Kite argues, is how AI finally graduates from cost-cutter to growth engine, one curious pod at a time.

Continue Reading

Trending