Connect with us


Diamond Customers now need Modern Designs that are not Gender-Specific




In the key US market, nearly 90% of engagement rings and 80% of wedding rings contain diamonds. De Beers Group’s latest Diamond insight report states that young couples still consider diamonds as the primary embodiment of everlasting love and romance. Report says that diamonds continue to hold its position with it being the predominant choice for engagements and weddings.

It is a wrong perception that young couples are not interested or less interested than previous generations in diamonds to honor their love relations. In fact millennial spending on women’s wedding rings is higher than the overall market average in the US. Something that has changed is the choice in designs. Millennials ask for a more original, design-led pieces. The retailers now need to present more diversity in product design to customers. New generation is even eager to buy customized designs as they seem more thoughtful.

The share of US women buying their own engagement ring has doubled from 7% to 14% in the last 5 years. With more economic independence of women in relations and society in general has lead to the buying power in their hands so they are more involved and interested in what they will be wearing in their fingers for a lifetime. This trend is making the retailers happy as when women buy their own engagement ring, they tend to spend 33% more than men on an average.

But it’s not just the engagement ring where couples see a place for diamonds to demonstrate their love. There is also a fast-growing segment of unmarried living in couples who are using diamonds as gifts of love and so are the same sex couples, with 70% of them viewing diamonds as important for celebrating both relationship milestones, as well as each other as individuals. These rising trends has given an opportunity to retailers for develop designing, marketing & advertising that will reflect the modern couples and their purchasing behavior.

The idea of Bigtime Daily landed this engineer cum journalist from a multi-national company to the digital avenue. Matthew brought life to this idea and rendered all that was necessary to create an interactive and attractive platform for the readers. Apart from managing the platform, he also contributes his expertise in business niche.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


What “Reasonable Person” Standard Is Applicable When Determining Negligence?




In order to determine negligence, the reasonable person test asks if a person’s actions are consistent with what would be anticipated of a generally careful and sensible person in the same situation. Stated otherwise, did the accused act in a way that would have been expected of a reasonable person? 

In Florida, determining who is legally liable for an accident depends critically on the issue of carelessness. The “reasonable person standard” is the foundation of this assessment. Your personal injury lawyer can explain the “reasonable person standard” and how it can apply to your case if you are hurt in an accident in Florida. 

The Reasonable Person Standard: What Is It?

Legally speaking, the reasonable person standard offers a yardstick by which someone’s actions are assessed in cases of negligence. “How would a reasonable person have acted under the same circumstances?” is the central question it poses. Jurors and judges are asked this question in order to assist them in determining whether a person’s acts (or inactions) fall short of the expected standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would follow.

Like in many other jurisdictions, Florida does not base its reasonable person criterion on what an especially cautious or risk-averse person would do. Rather, it represents the behaviors of a composite of what the community expects of each individual. A reasonable individual would, for example, observe traffic laws when driving, heed warning signs, and refrain from needlessly endangering other people.

Utilizing the Reasonable Person Standard to Determine Negligence

The activities of the parties involved in a personal injury lawsuit are rigorously examined in light of this reasonable person standard. If it is determined that an individual’s actions do not correspond with what a reasonable person would have done in the same situation, negligence has been proven.

According to the law, proof of someone’s negligence is insufficient; strong, convincing evidence is required. Your personal injury lawyer is essential to this procedure because they have to painstakingly gather evidence showing how the negligent party strayed from what a reasonable person would have done. Piecing together facts, testimony, and any footage or recordings that can definitively demonstrate that their activities were in violation of the recognized norms of safety and care is more important than simply focusing on what they did or did not do.

This proof could take the form of eyewitness statements that refute the version of events provided by the person at fault or security footage that captures the moment of negligence. Something as small as skipping a scheduled maintenance or ignoring a warning alert might have a big impact. Your personal injury attorney seeks to establish beyond a shadow of a doubt that the defendant’s acts were not just improper but directly caused others to be put in danger by providing a thorough picture of their negligence. 

How Does This Impact Your Case for Personal Injury?

In a personal injury case, knowing the reasonable person standard is essential. In the event of an accident, this standard might assist you in proving liability if you think the other person was careless.

You should be aware that your activities will be evaluated in comparison to the hypothetical reasonable person’s behavior in situations where you might be held culpable. It doesn’t matter what you meant or thought was appropriate; what matters is what the community would anticipate from someone in your situation.

Although navigating the complexities of the reasonable person standard might be challenging, Florida’s negligence law heavily relies on this standard. A fair appraisal of the facts is essential when seeking justice following an injury accident, and comprehending this criterion is crucial.

Continue Reading