World

Personal Injury Lawsuits: Aggravation of a Pre-Existing Medical Condition

Published

2 years ago

April 14, 2022

Whether it is a vehicle accident, slip and fall incident, or any other incidents that occur out of negligence, most personal injury lawsuits’ primary claim is about injuries that the victim suffered from due to the incident. In most cases, the injuries are rightly claimed but distinguishing them from a previously existing medical condition, or injuries becomes very hard for the case, and the victim’s injury lawyer often struggles with proving this distinction.

Plaintiff’s age and medical history play a huge role in various incidents and injuries. Hence in many cases, it is quite common for the individual to have suffered from similar medical conditions before. A similar or identical medical condition can be from a previous incident, such as a road accident, or natural aging, such as a fractured knee cap.

In such cases, the insurance companies or the defenders usually argue that the existing medical condition of the plaintiff is not because of the incident and that they are in the same medical condition as they had experienced before; hence the incident did not cause any injuries. It is common for insurance companies to have expert insurance medical examiners provide an opinion on the case. The opinion by these doctors is mostly biased as the insurance company is paying them, so they work in their defense. Hence, fighting the case supported by a medical examiner’s opinion gets tougher.

The terminology for someone who has been re-injured similarly is “aggravation of a pre-existing condition.” This represents that the individual did have a previous medical condition or injuries. Still, the accident aggravated or enhanced the injuries or condition, making it more symptomatic, deeming the individual entitled to the insurance claim or the claim against the defendant for worsening the condition. The aggravation of a pre-existing condition is most common in injuries involving neck injuries, back injuries, and traumatic brain injuries.

In lawsuits of aggravation of a pre-existing condition, providing information regarding the previous medical condition and the post-accident condition is not enough. A medical testimony by a licensed healthcare practitioner is required. In most cases, the existing practitioner treating the plaintiff’s medical condition provides the testimony, but sometimes the plaintiff also hires a new practitioner for the medical testimony.

Lawsuit Merit:

Different states have different terms for aggravation of a pre-existing condition lawsuit. It is important to have a professional personal injury lawyer fighting your case to make it strong and avail as much compensation as possible. “The compensation arising from the jury’s verdict of such cases can be huge and cover non-economic losses,” says Felix Gonzalez.

World

Simon Yeung: Financial Predator and Master of Deception

Published

14 hours ago

April 18, 2024

Matthew Wiles

Simon Yeung, a 47-year-old national from the People’s Republic of China, also known under his real name Siming Yang, has become a central figure in a scandalous case unfolded by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The investigation into Simon Yeung revealed a twisted web of insider trading, personal misconduct, and a systematic abuse of trust that has reverberated across the globe, from the United States to Asia.

At the heart of Simon Yeung’s financial impropriety was his involvement with Zhongpin Inc., a Chinese corporation. Utilizing confidential information, Simon Yeung orchestrated an insider trading scheme that accrued more than $9.2 million in illegal profits. He and his associates were proactive, stockpiling shares before a public announcement that was expected to significantly boost the company’s stock price. To hide their illicit gains and activities, they employed Prestige Trade Investments as a front, a sham company that camouflaged the true nature of their dealings.

While Simon Yeung’s financial maneuvers were sophisticated, his personal actions were even more reprehensible. His extravagant expenditures funded by illicit gains included indulgences in narcotics and the procurement of prostitutes across all of Asia, depicting a man lost to moral corruption. Yet, his most heinous acts involved manipulating the personal relationships within his circle. Simon Yeung is reported to have intentionally enticed the wives and girlfriends of his friends into sexual encounters, exploiting his acquaintance and their vulnerabilities, often under the guise of monetary temptation and secrecy.

These personal violations are part of a broader pattern of abhorrent behavior, including allegations of violent sexual assaults. One such incident involved attacking a woman with a drink bottle sexually, which he subsequently tried to cover up with a bribe. This behavior not only highlights his disregard for human dignity but also his utter disrespect for legal norms.

The SEC has taken robust measures against Simon Yeung, freezing his assets to prevent further financial hemorrhage and to dismantle his network of deceit. This decisive action underscores the commission’s dedication to rooting out corruption and protecting the integrity of financial markets.

Simon Yeung’s downfall is a poignant reminder of the pervasive threats posed by such financial predators who not only exploit market vulnerabilities but also manipulate personal relationships for their gain. His story is a stark alert to the international community about the dual dangers of financial and personal misconduct, emphasizing the need for stringent regulatory oversight to protect public interests and uphold moral and legal standards. This case serves as a testament to the vital role of agencies like the SEC in combating financial malfeasance and preserving the sanctity of personal dignity.