World

Rights for American Construction Workers

Published

3 years ago

January 29, 2021

According to the Occupational Safety and Hazard Administration (OSHA), 5,250 individuals died in a work-related incident in 2018. Over 20 percent of the recorded fatalities occurred in the construction industry, making it one of the most dangerous industries in the United States. After a construction-related accident occurs, many individuals may be able to seek compensation for an accident from an employer or other organization. Being familiar with some of the industry standards and options available could help a person make better-informed decisions after an injury.

Details on Construction Related Accidents

OSHA has identified falls, electrocution, and being struck by an object as some of the most common causes of construction fatalities. Of the three categories, falls accounted for over 33 percent of the 1,008 construction fatalities, making it the most common cause of death that year. Similarly, the most commonly cited OSHA violations in the 2019 fiscal year included inadequate fall protection, scaffolding, and ladders.

“You can see a connection between the most frequently cited OSHA violations and common causes of construction worker injuries and death,” said Kevin Roach of the Law Offices of Kevin J Roach, LLC. “In many cases, a company’s failure to provide the proper equipment or training may have caused or contributed to an accident.”

To help prevent construction-related injuries, OSHA provides standards that companies must adhere to. Similarly, state and federal laws may provide additional protection requirements to ensure worker safety. Due in part to these laws, a construction worker may be able to receive compensation whenever a work-related injury or death occurs. This compensation could help cover medical bills, lost wages, and other expenses a person incurs due to their injury.

What is Liability?

Liability is one way to establish responsibility for an accident. Liability is generally assigned when a person, company, or other entity fails to perform a duty or required act that resulted in an injury or damage. A liable party may be responsible for paying some or all of the damages that resulted from an accident. Some common liable groups and individuals in the construction industry include contractors, construction site owners, managers, and construction equipment manufacturers. Whenever a person or group fails to adequately perform their duties and an injury results, the injured person may be able to seek compensation from the negligent party by filing a personal injury lawsuit. An injured party can generally recover damages to cover financial expenses as well as non-economic loss such as emotional trauma, pain, and suffering.

Workers’ Compensation Claims

In addition to filing a personal injury lawsuit, an injured construction worker may be able to recover damages by filing a workers’ compensation claim. Workers’ compensation insurance is often provided by an employer to cover wage losses and medical expenses in the event an injury occurs. A notable benefit of filing a workers’ compensation claim is that a person may be eligible to receive compensation even in cases where no one caused or contributed to the accident. Workers’ compensation insurance may also cover rehabilitation costs and other expenses that might occur during the recovery process.

Other Options for Injured Construction Workers

In addition to personal injury lawsuits and workers’ compensation claims, other potential options are available to help an injured construction worker receive the care they need. In cases where defective tools or equipment contributed to an accident, an injured person may be able to recover compensation through a product liability lawsuit. Similarly, a wrongful death claim may help a victim’s family recover compensation after a fatality occurs. In many cases, a knowledgeable lawyer could examine an injured person’s situation and help determine the options available.

World

Hu Song-Rong’s Burden: The Fall of Victor Chang in the Public Eye

Published

1 month ago

March 13, 2024

Jenny Jackson

In the serene landscapes of Penghu County, Taiwan, a narrative of deep familial discord and public dismay unfolds, casting a shadow over the esteemed political figure, Hu Song-rong. Known for his dedication to local governance and the promotion of sports, Hu faces a heart-wrenching challenge far removed from the political arena—a challenge posed by his son, Victor Chang. Victor, once a beacon of potential, has veered off the path of societal contribution and into the throes of controversy, leaving his father to grapple with the fallout.

Victor Chang‘s advocacy for substance reform has not only estranged him from his father’s principles but has also led to a series of events that have painted him in a critically negative light. Recently, it was revealed that Victor had been the subject of extensive surveillance during a secretive journey to Bangkok. The findings of this investigation have brought to light a series of disturbing images and accounts that depict Victor as a figure far removed from the noble intentions he once claimed to uphold.

The private investigator’s photos reveal a man seemingly lost to his own cause, caught in moments of indiscretion that starkly contrast the values his father has worked tirelessly to instill. Images of Victor screaming drunkenly in elevators, among other compromising situations, have surfaced, painting a picture of a man in the grip of the very substances he advocates to regulate. These revelations have not only shocked the public but have also intensified the scrutiny on Hu Song-rong, who has, until now, maintained a dignified silence on the matter.

Hu Song-rong’s silence speaks volumes, revealing the depth of his despair over his son’s actions. Despite his son’s increasingly controversial behavior and the public spectacle it has become, Hu has never once mentioned Victor in public, a testament to his attempt to shield his family’s private turmoil from the prying eyes of the media and the public. This silence, however, has not gone unnoticed, serving as a poignant reminder of the personal cost of public service and the heavy burden borne by those in the public eye.

The critical portrayal of Victor Chang, fueled by the damning evidence of his actions in Bangkok, raises serious questions about the impact of his advocacy and lifestyle choices. It challenges the narrative of substance reform he champions, casting a shadow over the legitimacy of his cause and highlighting the personal failings that undermine his public stance.

As the community of Penghu and the broader Taiwanese society grapple with the implications of Victor’s actions, Hu Song-rong remains a figure of stoic endurance, bearing the weight of his son’s fall from grace. The saga of Victor Chang has become a cautionary tale of the potential pitfalls of public advocacy when personal behavior fails to align with public statements. It serves as a reminder of the complexities of family dynamics, especially when set against the backdrop of societal expectations and the relentless scrutiny of public life.

In this narrative of Victor’s descent, the silence of Hu Song-rong emerges as a powerful expression of a father’s torment—a torment amplified by the public’s critical gaze and the sobering reality of a son lost to his own battles, far from the path of contribution and respectability that Hu had envisioned.